From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF39CA9EA0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C1221783 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="EUXGAVBr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47C1221783 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56414 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMu2S-0000fr-Bz for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:17:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtuP-00018b-RO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:09:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtuO-0001wc-K1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:09:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::443]:34969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtuO-0001va-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:09:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id l10so17588022wrb.2 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:09:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HLFEhb4yWyFLuZldasRJU+5tlwNrCRGjNpkGcYT3knE=; b=EUXGAVBrB0X33Yt56fYtzQ1sjCJzmd6n855IiFa1DB4zyvT844w7QNYvXRB1ternUu zeyfArIisVstRyZzA7rc/ZRxYPufXujBy9iIYQPz2Muhjjrnmec0S+uMzme2npzHZDbw rn/9bd6esIkZY56RrlAL0AloNipLS0josSR2IjILN2XGT6qMD4dTXyy+tWaAOMzVFg+3 Pisb3Egv0U/CUEk5+Dk6tDzZg9OPbRq3J3rArsoCuRDWRbzR/KVM4umg2xncpin9RQDB o8yzDYtnyVnSML3mBEChybOpsSb0+A57xkBdN8s4dsDBfKBGjZkQ+x4apI4s90RoQxBh 9f0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HLFEhb4yWyFLuZldasRJU+5tlwNrCRGjNpkGcYT3knE=; b=BDzGy8+vwSFGTF7QU9XHAqZn89NGtlzQMfqN/c5Lu+eJN4kgMjY2IiA1TZPtlqUHZh lg/J4n8K13qkFzYE9NTsyw/5tlUH8v5fVOs9nNMb+/sArIDRXF4FOaUUtys2RhgoQr59 ZRVENv55sYOKoKZjAYK7+iW/x/pNqkLWVXSvZJbkh0EyuloTKoDQtxZZhI84nFSEcnh/ n7y6nRowXytukbDVmR4fI2psU7ltC3whqTCb992kb9FdzuBVtnZH9IeYfOIOp/kzcNg8 y9mn37hjOYB8N97N7rV6zB3oRvkVDQvHKFCuRse3ajj0zhnGDhAkFuAhbLBQdJc2RRWt VtWg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhxzYPMzsHgRSNJKv1Y0rbL5o+8PdmKt3LkhFs1J0vXNt9C1MU ZWsewXH8WNDJqVSViCyuYmZ0Og== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycSDtAkTOGGMIlsnH1N2cJwFZd710oJpAYd95I51vQ7xhgxHJWZBUC4fWVK9kjgxbaNm1mxw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:eed2:: with SMTP id a18mr3693966wrp.273.1571749746601; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 74sm28931923wrm.92.2019.10.22.06.09.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id F197B1FF87; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:09:04 +0100 (BST) References: <20191022072135.11188-1-thuth@redhat.com> <8e7b1ebe-edd7-6a45-e95b-dd2fd0d6f1c1@redhat.com> <87ftjlvwjd.fsf@linaro.org> <622d7844-c532-2de8-f39d-ba81082ed5d2@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 27.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable more iotests during "make check-block" In-reply-to: <622d7844-c532-2de8-f39d-ba81082ed5d2@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:09:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0epvsen.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::443 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Thomas Huth writes: > On 22/10/2019 13.39, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >> >> Thomas Huth writes: >> >>> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> As discussed here: >>>> >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html >>>> >>>> and here: >>>> >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html >>>> >>>> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the >>>> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check". >>>> >>>> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been >>>> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too. >>> >>> Oh well, some Travis jobs are now running too long and hit the 50 >>> minutes limit: >>> >>> https://travis-ci.com/huth/qemu/jobs/248158477 >>> >>> ... so we either might need to remove some other iotests from the "auto" >>> group again, or change the Travis jobs to include less targets... >>> >>> That "clang + sanitizer" job was already running 45 minutes before my >>> change, so it was already close to the limit. So I'd suggest to change >>> it to include less targets. Opinions? >> >> Which one is clang with sanitizers? I think we only build softmmu for >> gcc + sanitizer at the moment. > > I meant this one here: > > - env: > - CONFIG=3D"--target-list=3D${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS} " > compiler: clang > before_script: > - ./configure ${CONFIG} --extra-cflags=3D"-fsanitize=3Dundefined > -Werror" || { cat config.log && exit 1; } Hmm we already only do the main SOFTMMU targets. I wonder if we could be caching better? > > Thomas -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e