From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679E7C2BC73 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3135E2073B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NhsPy8T/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3135E2073B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38678 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icURB-0001Hg-Cu for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:11:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icUQJ-0000VF-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:10:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icUQH-0000Dd-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:10:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:21424 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icUQF-0008Un-5D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:10:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575465021; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PvkzPMxJfN2ugJmEUKDiuJ2DHsBoTtCeDxuubBrk41s=; b=NhsPy8T/zCe8uj3SIT57ab2/mCJaEqfHVzPbAO5rmIxWqTq8w2+I3t+YCONfRfJN3WS2sT D5yFHR3MSKQ8X1BLpb9FmFXbV5SXvh+djYCOBLLZpo6Igs5UFGrJ+W7AqdNcPkcL2xq9+z +rmo9xDB8E0FO2O188vFvrXvgRLdeLk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-32-GLZkzULkOQCLepKx_8pNfQ-1; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:10:17 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260C0107ACC4; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-134.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.134]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A921C5DA76; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 303F01138606; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:10:00 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? References: <20191125185021.GB3767@work-vm> <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <87k17ekhs9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191203105341.GB3078@work-vm> <20191203111949.GB267814@redhat.com> <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191204120418.GH3325@work-vm> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:10:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191204120418.GH3325@work-vm> (David Alan Gilbert's message of "Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:04:18 +0000") Message-ID: <87fti09qzb.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-MC-Unique: GLZkzULkOQCLepKx_8pNfQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , "Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?=" , qemu-block@nongnu.org, mszeredi@redhat.com, Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , Max Reitz , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , =?utf-8?Q?M?= =?utf-8?Q?arc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , vgoyal@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" writes: > So what do you think of Paolo's suggestion of putting virtiofsd in=20 > fsdev (mkdir fsdev/9p && mv fsdev/* fsdev/9p && mkdir fsdev/virtiofsd ) No objections. Flatter: fsdev-9p/ and fsdev-virtio/. Matter of taste.