From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVNQW-0003mw-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:59:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVNQR-0000dn-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:59:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:34582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVNQR-0000dS-51 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:59:07 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b205so77746846wmb.1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:59:06 -0800 (PST) References: <1454664263-25969-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <1454664263-25969-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:59:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87h9h9yhw7.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/12] tests: Introducing docker tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, sw@weilnetz.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini , jsnow@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Fam Zheng writes: > v1: Since RFC, addressed comments from reviewers, and improved a lot of things. > Thanks to Daniel, Eric, Paolo, Stefan, for the feedback. > > This series adds a new "docker" make target family to run tests in created > docker containers. > > To begin with, this can be a place to store standard env/command combinations to > build and test QEMU. I think I'm done for this review pass. Please CC me on your next version. I've run a quick test on my ARM64 Debian Jessie box which predictably failed. It looks like this is a docker hub issue for one thing as: docker pull debian:stable creates an x86_64 image on the arm64 box which predictably fails. I suspect the only solution is going to be storing our own built images on the docker hub and tweaking the tooling to take host architecture into account. Do you have any non-x86 boxes to test against or are you going to need some help with non-x86 support? Cheers, -- Alex Bennée