From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org> To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>, Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/acceptance: Add a 'virt_kvm' test using the GICv3 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:32:35 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87k0p4lq9x.fsf@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a2a463cb-e2a1-1884-cc97-8c5b4689341b@redhat.com> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: > Hi Alex, > > On 4/12/21 7:55 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 4/6/21 7:12 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> >>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 3/31/21 5:45 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> The current 'virt_kvm' test is restricted to GICv2, but can also >>>>>> work with a GICv3. Duplicate it but add a GICv3 test which can be >>>>>> tested on some hardware. >>>>>> >>>>>> Noticed while running: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ avocado --show=app run -t machine:virt tests/acceptance/ >>>>>> ... >>>>>> (2/6) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm: ERROR: Unexpected empty reply from server (1.82 s) >>>>>> >>>>>> The job.log content is: >>>>>> >>>>>> L0351 DEBUG| Output: 'qemu-system-aarch64: host does not support in-kernel GICv2 emulation\n' >>>>>> >>>>>> With this patch: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ avocado --show=app run -t device:gicv3 tests/acceptance/ >>>>>> (1/1) >>>>>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm_gicv3: >>>>>> PASS (55.10 s) >>>>> >>>>> On the new aarch64 machine which is GICv3 I get the following: >>>>> >>>>> (006/142) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm_gicv2: ERROR: Unexpected empty reply from server (0.47 s) >>>>> >>>>> which it shouldn't have run. However: >>>>> >>>>> ./tests/venv/bin/avocado --show=app run -t device:gic3 tests/acceptance/ >>>>> Test Suite could not be create. No test references provided nor any other arguments resolved into tests >>>>> >>>>> Is this something that has regressed or am I doing it wrong? >>>> >>>> Typo in the tag: "device:gic3" -> "device:gicv3" >>> >>> Doh! >>> >>> But what about: >>> >>> /tests/venv/bin/avocado run tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm_gicv2 >>> JOB ID : 396696d8f9d31d970878cb46025b2ced76f3623f >>> JOB LOG : /home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2021-04-06T17.11-396696d/job.log >>> (1/1) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm_gicv2: ERROR: Unexpected empty reply from server (0.65 s) >>> RESULTS : PASS 0 | ERROR 1 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0 >>> JOB TIME : 0.96 s >>> >>> why doesn't that skip? >> >> /home/phil/avocado/job-results/job-2021-04-12T17.51-efdca81/job.log >> 2021-04-12 17:52:44,589 machine L0389 DEBUG| Output: >> "qemu-system-aarch64: Could not find ROM image >> '/home/phil/qemu/build/host/pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd'\n" >> >> Missing prerequisite: >> >> $ ninja pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd >> [1/1] Generating edk2-aarch64-code.fd with a custom command (wrapped by >> meson to capture output) >> >> Then we are good: >> >> $ avocado --show=app,console run -t device:gicv3 tests/acceptance >> JOB ID : e84401e5cc3ae53a3094c79491e661385cc7b4a7 >> JOB LOG : >> /home/phil/avocado/job-results/job-2021-04-12T17.53-e84401e/job.log >> (1/1) >> tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm_gicv3: >> PASS (16.38 s) >> RESULTS : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | >> CANCEL 0 >> JOB TIME : 16.70 s >> >> Probably some missing dependency in Makefile/Meson? > > Are you using multiple build directories? Yes - many. > I could reproduce doing: > > $ mkdir A B > $ cd A > $ make check-qtest-aarch64 > $ avocado --show=app,console run -t device:gicv3 tests/acceptance > $ cd ../B > $ ninja qemu-system-aarch64 > $ avocado --show=app,console run -t device:gicv3 tests/acceptance > > In A edk2-aarch64-code.fd has been expanded in A/pc-bios/, > in B it isn't. > > check-acceptance is a Makefile rule, not a ninja one... > I suppose we need to convert it to ninja to be able to use the > rest of the dependencies checks. > > Cc'ing Paolo because I'm not sure what the best move and where > to plug things. -- Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 17:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-29 22:48 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2020-09-30 13:24 ` Willian Rampazzo 2020-10-05 8:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2021-03-31 15:45 ` Alex Bennée 2021-04-06 15:22 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2021-04-06 17:12 ` Alex Bennée 2021-04-12 17:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2021-04-13 16:25 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2021-04-13 16:32 ` Alex Bennée [this message] 2021-05-26 18:04 ` Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87k0p4lq9x.fsf@linaro.org \ --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \ --cc=crosa@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=philmd@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \ --cc=willianr@redhat.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] tests/acceptance: Add a '\''virt_kvm'\'' test using the GICv3' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).