qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>,
	Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] monitor/qmp: fix race on CHR_EVENT_CLOSED without OOB
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:21:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf9tces9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YG2xUD5M7RCuIe+X@merkur.fritz.box> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:19:12 +0200")

Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:

> Am 22.03.2021 um 16:40 hat Stefan Reiter geschrieben:
>> The QMP dispatcher coroutine holds the qmp_queue_lock over a yield
>> point, where it expects to be rescheduled from the main context. If a
>> CHR_EVENT_CLOSED event is received just then, it can race and block the
>> main thread on the mutex in monitor_qmp_cleanup_queue_and_resume.
>> 
>> monitor_resume does not need to be called from main context, so we can
>> call it immediately after popping a request from the queue, which allows
>> us to drop the qmp_queue_lock mutex before yielding.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * different approach: move everything that needs the qmp_queue_lock mutex before
>>   the yield point, instead of moving the event handling to a different context
>
> The interesting new case here seems to be that new requests could be
> queued and the dispatcher coroutine could be kicked before yielding.
> This is safe because &qmp_dispatcher_co_busy is accessed with atomics
> on both sides.
>
> The important part is just that the first (conditional) yield stays
> first, so that the aio_co_wake() in handle_qmp_command() won't reenter
> the coroutine while it is expecting to be reentered from somewhere else.
> This is still the case after the patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Thanks for saving me from an ugly review headache.

Should this go into 6.0?



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 15:40 [PATCH v2] monitor/qmp: fix race on CHR_EVENT_CLOSED without OOB Stefan Reiter
2021-04-07 13:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-08  9:21   ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-04-08 10:27     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-08 12:49       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-08 13:27         ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-04-08 14:10           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-09 15:30 ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lf9tces9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=s.reiter@proxmox.com \
    --cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).