From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 4/5] qom: Let ObjectPropertyGet functions return a boolean value
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:26:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu21mznm.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ft9rrfol.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:07:38 +0200")
Making more functions taking Error ** return bool (commit
b6d7e9b66f..a43770df5d) created a number of false positive
CHECKED_RETURN Coverity issues. Peter notified me back then. This
series could help (we'd have to double-check), but it covers only the
getters, not the setters.
Peter, are you still interested in reducing the false positives (as
opposed to marking them)?
Philippe, are you still pursuing this series?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 17:58 [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 0/5] qom: Let ObjectPropertyGet functions return a boolean value Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-15 17:58 ` [PATCH-for-5.2 1/5] hw/core/qdev-properties: Simplify get_reserved_region() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-16 8:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-16 8:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-16 9:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-15 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 2/5] qom: Split ObjectPropertyAccessor as ObjectProperty[Get/Set] Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-15 17:58 ` [PATCH-for-5.2 3/5] qom: Use g_autofree in ObjectPropertyGet functions Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-15 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 4/5] qom: Let ObjectPropertyGet functions return a boolean value Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-16 9:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-07 14:26 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2020-09-07 14:36 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-07 14:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-15 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 5/5] hw/virtio: Simplify virtio_mem_set_requested_size() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-16 9:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-16 8:25 ` [RFC PATCH-for-5.2 0/5] qom: Let ObjectPropertyGet functions return a boolean value Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mu21mznm.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).