From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRb8s-0001Ff-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:49:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRb8o-000423-7A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:49:22 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1453978470-222624-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1453978688-222752-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20160128140212.GS3869@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160128180031.1d940e2f@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160203205556-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56B33676.6000502@redhat.com> <56B338F3.8000500@suse.de> <56B33C2A.8030405@redhat.com> <20160204140322-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:49:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160204140322-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:06:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87r3grd2bq.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev & hw/core owner? (was Re: [PATCH v19 7/9] machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , ghammer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, Igor Mammedov , cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Paolo Bonzini , lcapitulino@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , rth@twiddle.net "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marc= el >> > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. >>=20 >> Yes. >>=20 >> > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM >> > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up >> > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so th= at >> > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring >> > discussion? >>=20 >> I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for q= dev. >>=20 >> Paolo > > If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are > better than one. *If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together.