From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8ADCA9EA0 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCE5204FD for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="iUC0TSJd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9DCE5204FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOxsT-0003N1-NS for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:47:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOxrj-0002Kj-5d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:46:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOxrg-0008Kv-PT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:46:53 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:57980 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOxrg-0008KK-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:46:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572241611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DYU5enKK9OjKzV0PS0WzG0v+t43VUN3xt6liLWc5t4Y=; b=iUC0TSJd/YVH/+cbwQ+fWuRx4X+w3xpY8gZpveGl6HFc0BCVa1/iriHioTPU9E1K5gbUQw siwfk8sVAZ+z06UW1uDdqRWHVYgS7ET2z5bRulAQBDrwrOZckKfSP02ABeVM6VfvfIxjZj RpJ6j1GGbuSAWIMzSlz1mKzaJYksO1o= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-91-mK2TWLsJPU-lggAmzz1uBg-1; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:46:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9B51005510; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.36.118.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AA05DA2C; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 15C6511385C9; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:46:42 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Tao Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/12] numa: Extend CLI to provide memory latency and bandwidth information References: <20191020111125.27659-1-tao3.xu@intel.com> <20191020111125.27659-7-tao3.xu@intel.com> <20191023172854.42c495d5@redhat.com> <9e30d8fe-7274-4ee8-3c4b-64c370141358@intel.com> <20191025152720.4068bfae@redhat.com> <87wocsobil.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191025205141.GF6744@habkost.net> <71543104-7254-c25e-e87c-d73a894bcc2e@intel.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:46:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <71543104-7254-c25e-e87c-d73a894bcc2e@intel.com> (Tao Xu's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:05:21 +0800") Message-ID: <87tv7tv2v1.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-MC-Unique: mK2TWLsJPU-lggAmzz1uBg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , "Liu, Jingqi" , "Du, Fan" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "jonathan.cameron@huawei.com" , Igor Mammedov Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Tao Xu writes: > Got it. I will use bytes per second for bandwidth here. Usually we use > nanosecond for memory latency, so if we use second for latency, it may > lose precision. So can I use nanosecond here, because we now use > nanosecond as smallest time unit. Sounds fair, go ahead.