From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFC9C32771 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9877820673 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Mb+SHFZr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9877820673 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipUTb-00063u-Qc for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:51:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipUSb-0005cZ-Ba for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:50:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipUSZ-0005Yc-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:50:36 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:52701 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipUSZ-0005Vd-GP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:50:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578563432; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VuX+qcg0QQrWCA0S2lv5KwXESV4MGilM3W5kuGOX6eU=; b=Mb+SHFZrgLOH3JZ4fIE7E8OvCVo8HSxNAvx1khIU1RL3rOmAcX7Dq27GEluMWirEgTAJ7s Eu+8tlhzSyrFT28ZJSk2s5jQd5zwV1SjArZp3GIEEz3C+N+3sqI0W3aKu1IAJdJW0InCSW fGik6ybuKV+Bt10UwCwnHQunMCwXx+Y= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-373-wHwMkwcdMmKk7B9XLG69Ag-1; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:50:28 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D855C184B1E4; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-22.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED0B1001B11; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela To: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy In-Reply-To: <20200106012640.GA15834@richard> (Wei Yang's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:26:40 +0800") References: <20191025232000.25857-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20191216023539.GB21865@richard> <20200106012640.GA15834@richard> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:50:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9plyn4u.fsf@secure.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-MC-Unique: wHwMkwcdMmKk7B9XLG69Ag-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Wei Yang wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>Would this one be picked up this time? > > Happy new year to all. > > Can I ask the plan for this patch set? queued > >> >>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable >>>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure. >>> >>>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption. >>>Patch 2 does the main job. >>> >>>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send a= nother >>>patch set. >>> >>>Wei Yang (2): >>> migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet >>> migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy >>> >>> migration/ram.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>>--=20 >>>2.17.1 >> >>--=20 >>Wei Yang >>Help you, Help me