On 7/17/19 2:21 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>> Is this worth squeezing into 4.1, to start the deprecation clock one
>> cycle earlier (on the grounds that the missing information for anonymous
>> nodes is a bug)?  Or am I pushing the boundaries too far, where keeping
>> this as 4.2 material remains the best course of action?
>>
> 
> Appealing option. If you think the deprecation plan is actionable enough
> for libvirt, I'm in favor.

I know my code for scraping query-block output during
virDomainCheckpointGetXMLDesc(,VIR_DOMAIN_CHECKPOINT_XML_SIZE) that
reports the size of the bitmap to the end user hasn't landed yet, and
that appears to be the only client in libvirt of this information at the
moment; but it's not a problem for me to check introspection for where
to find it (as libvirt already has a good framework for scraping
introspection for other reasons).

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org