From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1A8C04FF3 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEAA613AD for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:07:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3AEAA613AD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:32892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9N5-0004NA-6p for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:07:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9M2-0003N4-LG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:06:42 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll9M0-0006ju-Ip for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:06:42 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1621857997; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I3V4LFjtInPvuBrNsoaS3C2h1OCWgswWo/mAr9mKwT8=; b=AMmkJYSiJLojXeOqIcQgtVNgURJ+FoJ7DSfdlEvtcLbUyRJTWvXzbJJfSBgKcmk73Smajw Y16MpDpmrlsnBH0fDoaLi1jU6qRF17ut7BpSZDgIMnbz8HMZ1msdyL3KcCBcDie8uOCmeA Hft63fJ/I0Q8rUfuKewjEFIbMXFR8WI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1621857997; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I3V4LFjtInPvuBrNsoaS3C2h1OCWgswWo/mAr9mKwT8=; b=bUYTKu/o3F9I41NR0jxtRTvcnaCsY29l2AD481PQBVWgc6cYfzy+RBYWVzHjeUXCgqM61T AtC9YaHVQ4sxs4DQ== Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770A5AC11; Mon, 24 May 2021 12:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: latest GOOD state of series i386 cleanup, arm cleanup, s390 cleanup To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= References: <466cf154-cabf-2e8f-021f-a82cf7b88b31@suse.de> <20be5f7e-f475-4f3c-0fca-fff1750c08fe@suse.de> <87tun0cf3d.fsf@linaro.org> <198d8ef3-cc15-6f9d-6455-286748a705a8@suse.de> <871ra1crx4.fsf@linaro.org> From: Claudio Fontana Message-ID: <8c016171-5c59-ee82-7fd7-6afa61182fb7@suse.de> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:06:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871ra1crx4.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.220.15; envelope-from=cfontana@suse.de; helo=mx2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Liang Yan , Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Paolo Bonzini , Al Cho Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 5/20/21 6:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Claudio Fontana writes: > >> On 5/18/21 4:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> >>> Claudio Fontana writes: >>> >>>> On 5/17/21 11:53 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> due to my inactivity for a few weeks coupled likely with the upstream processes around qemu-6.0 now the series: >>>>> >>>>> 1) i386 cleanup >>>>> 2) arm cleanup and experimental kvm-only build >>>>> 3) s390 cleanup >>>>> >>>>> have become stale and hard to rebase on latest master. >>>>> This effect is compounded by the fact that lots of broken tests in >>>>> master have been added. >>> >>> Which tests are these? I know master suffers a bit from occasional >>> falling red but to my knowledge everything should be green (at least >>> from my last PR anyway ;-). >>> >>>>> >>>>> In the interest of not losing work, >>>>> I provide here the latest known good state of these series: >>>>> >>>>> For the i386 cleanup: >>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/293603386 >>>>> >>>>> Tests started breaking horribly since about 1/2 weeks. >>> >>> The pipeline only shows one failed test (checkpatch) which is an >>> allowfail I believe. /me is confused. >> >> Hi Alex, yes, I pointed to the last pipeline that works :-) >> >>> >>>>> The latest version of the cleanup is reachable here: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git branch "i386_cleanup_9" >>>>> >>>>> In my understanding, Paolo has now picked up this one. >>>>> >>>>> For the ARM cleanup and experimental kvm-only build: >>>>> >>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/293603376 >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git branch "arm_cleanup_v15" >>>>> >>>>> Again here tests started misbehaving in the same timeframe. >>>>> >>>>> The state of ARM cleanup is still experimental, maybe Liang or >>>>> Philippe you can adopt this one? > > I've done a re-base onto the current master (and my testing/next): > > https://github.com/stsquad/qemu/tree/review/arm_cleanup_v15 > > which is currently working it's way through my CI: > > https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/pipelines/306727076 > > As I've got patches waiting for this re-factor I'm happy to take the > series on if you've run out of time/patience ;-) > I don't see any other takers so it makes sense, thanks a lot! Maybe Liang you could help Alex along the way in promoting this work from experimental state to ready for actual integration? Thanks, Claudio