From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AF2C433E0 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B814D64F1C for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:51:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B814D64F1C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vivier.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59672 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNCjV-0006aS-PX for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 06:51:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNCif-00066A-Lj; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 06:51:05 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:53789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNCic-0006FF-Qn; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 06:51:05 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.1] ([82.142.20.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [213.165.67.103]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgNlH-1ltoqO2sr1-00hupn; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:50:55 +0100 To: Max Reitz , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Qemu-block References: <20210315204226.3481044-1-laurent@vivier.eu> <20210315204226.3481044-6-laurent@vivier.eu> <2730eee0-6f1b-2139-f93c-6a0a64727e29@redhat.com> <905c797a-25c3-bb43-5946-54b28d9530c0@vivier.eu> <27c791b2-dcc0-6c98-d765-ac1b60b7af3d@vivier.eu> <0d55cabf-0fa0-f9fd-6436-de2e03422329@vivier.eu> <0b3cedb8-f40a-18fd-5030-a596afb9298d@redhat.com> <82f6dc3e-18bf-f90a-7e43-5568b319767c@redhat.com> <3bcc22b2-eb25-b0a0-f47b-72c747ca6f0a@redhat.com> <1a2a91a4-0425-0da9-482b-f46a6e17b6b0@redhat.com> From: Laurent Vivier Subject: Re: [PULL 5/5] m68k: add Virtual M68k Machine Message-ID: <9743c786-e620-8e50-be7d-f0c38984e29e@vivier.eu> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:50:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1a2a91a4-0425-0da9-482b-f46a6e17b6b0@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:IN6j4ETy29zQpYhH1voNRjry+JPILuWNFIEqgViQxCFoVdOY+Dj IUj0HqC7BRt9dvrfdpsghyrljwkDnMcAPoT0U7tlhumiYkWYVlmEcwlg4MuL9Uo7xi/llef roCCrvFYHIMu7aUDViCIzdmlwg10o3Qcm2u6BJG8sV1z5gHcvknpZgxCP/vmtgcgCjqbyNu kgxx+F99sl4YWM0HIvdfQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:DrTAFL30/lE=:gRXSge1RCh7TjgQSOLxuib aqS4AHBA4R8g8G1jB4j0eA6eRvssMd0kq4+VGpRpOYGUi+MgzTDzLHZR3Zj/8nAjFZZVdWXFe tWKMwWj1tt/kSGy7TlZfpS6uXbbPeeIUNvPL97GrVVexH/29JrMQl9GmnlaQYCrnOmucq8g7+ KLvUboFhuooixhIhZ0v+0XEfjZub9HIUWfmWhom9li1aZL3e3LqEjV4hwDjbUcecxRwhNEyHd /RIgSKGeJ8S9kCRmF2Qb5/rLA2vw/YMzoWE6F96F8zwTN4JGgNsK9bf0To9BdCPWsv11clDPa K32oZchqwaeCCkEZiSF15KB5OzVDOOrLYfiksLOtzMG8v7uKQJOfzZrQMZQryIQCteoAOQ3E+ 0sdODD26s9/KoPZ2WxIMqCBrqL9yvYf+fLkLb+czXAJIabIxOGywBa/YpFfvz+0rn5JRVLSAX wbx0ZGIClw== Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.227.126.134; envelope-from=laurent@vivier.eu; helo=mout.kundenserver.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Le 19/03/2021 à 10:20, Max Reitz a écrit : > On 19.03.21 07:32, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 18/03/2021 18.28, Max Reitz wrote: >> [...] >>>  From that it follows that I don’t see much use in testing specific devices either.  Say there’s >>> a platform that provides both virtio-pci and virtio-mmio, the default (say virtio-pci) is fine >>> for the iotests. I see little value in testing virtio-mmio as well.  (Perhaps I’m short-sighted, >>> though.) >> >> That's a fair point. But still, if someone compiled QEMU only with a target that only provided >> virtio-mmio, the iotests should not fail when running "make check". >> To avoid that we continue playing whack-a-mole here in the future, maybe it would be better to >> restrict the iotests to the "main" targets only, e.g. modify check-block.sh so that the tests only >> run with x86, aarch64, s390x and ppc64 ? > > Right, that would certainly be the simplest solution. > The problem with that is we can't run the tests if target-list doesn't contain one of these targets. Thanks, Laurent