qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:36:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f9d9b6b-55e5-fe69-d6c2-f7c229b4021a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120114334.2287-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 we have a new ipib of type 5. The ipib
> holds the address and length of the secure execution header, as well
> as a list of guest components.
> 
> Each component is a block of memory, for example kernel or initrd,
> which needs to be decrypted by the Ultravisor in order to run a
> protected VM. The secure execution header instructs the Ultravisor on
> how to handle the protected VM and its components.
> 
> Subcodes 8 and 9 are similiar to 5 and 6 and subcode 10 will finally
> start the protected guest.
> 
> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> index d4813105db..7b8a493509 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,24 @@
>  #include "cpu.h"
>  #include "hw/qdev-core.h"
>  
> +struct IPLBlockPVComp {
> +    uint64_t tweak_pref;
> +    uint64_t addr;
> +    uint64_t size;
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct IPLBlockPVComp IPLBlockPVComp;
> +
> +struct IPLBlockPV {
> +    uint8_t  reserved[84];
> +    uint8_t  reserved67[3];

What does the "67" mean here?

> +    uint8_t  version;
> +    uint32_t num_comp;
> +    uint64_t pv_header_addr;
> +    uint64_t pv_header_len;
> +    struct IPLBlockPVComp components[];
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct IPLBlockPV IPLBlockPV;

Given the fact that we had quite some headaches with QEMU_PACKED structs
in the past already, and the structs seem to be naturally aligned ...
what about dropping the QEMU_PACKED here and using QEMU_BUILD_BUG() to
assert that the struct has the correct size?

[...]
> @@ -185,4 +211,11 @@ static inline bool iplb_valid_fcp(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
>             iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool iplb_valid_se(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
> +{
> +    return be32_to_cpu(iplb->len) >= S390_IPLB_MIN_PV_LEN &&
> +           iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_PV;
> +}
> +
> +

Drop one empty line?

>  #endif
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index 067c667ba7..32049bb4ee 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>  #define DIAG_308_RC_OK              0x0001
>  #define DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF         0x0102
>  #define DIAG_308_RC_INVALID         0x0402
> +#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF      0x0a02
> +#define DIAG_308_RC_INV_FOR_PV      0x0b02
>  
>  #define DIAG308_RES_MOD_CLR		0
>  #define DIAG308_RES_LOAD_NORM		1
> @@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>  #define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP	4
>  #define DIAG308_SET			5
>  #define DIAG308_STORE			6
> +#define DIAG308_PV_SET			8
> +#define DIAG308_PV_STORE		9
> +#define DIAG308_PV_START		10
>  
>  static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
>                                uintptr_t ra, bool write)
> @@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>          s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_REIPL);
>          break;
>      case DIAG308_SET:
> +    case DIAG308_PV_SET: /* Set SE parms */
>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
>              return;
>          }
> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>  
>          cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>  
> -        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
> +        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
> +            !(iplb_valid_se(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_comp(iplb) >= 0)) {
>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
>              goto out;
>          }
> @@ -128,10 +135,15 @@ out:
>          g_free(iplb);
>          return;
>      case DIAG308_STORE:
> +    case DIAG308_PV_STORE: /* Get SE parms */
>          if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
>              return;
>          }
> -        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> +        if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
> +        } else {
> +            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> +        }
>          if (iplb) {
>              cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> @@ -139,6 +151,16 @@ out:
>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
>          }
>          return;
> +        break;

<hamletmode>
To return or to break, that's the question...
</hamletmode>

... please choose one of the two.

> +    case DIAG308_PV_START: /* SE start */
> +        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
> +        if (!iplb_valid_se(iplb)) {
> +            env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF;
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
> +        s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
> +        break;
>      default:
>          s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>          break;
> 

 Thomas



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20 11:43 [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] s390x: Cleanup cpu resets Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:10   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:32     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:18       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 12:53   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:11     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17       ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] s390x: Beautify diag308 handling Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:28     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:12     ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:20   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:53     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:47   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:36   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-02-07  7:56     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:12     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] s390x: protvirt: Sync PV state Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:25   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:43     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:43   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 13:43   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:33     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:25     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:28       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:31         ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 14:32           ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:39   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 13:49     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:07   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 14:20     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:50   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:00     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:04     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:23         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:29     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 15:11   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:38     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:45       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 16:54         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:11   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:24     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:48       ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] RFC: s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 12:19     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:22       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:30   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:39     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:08     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:28   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:36     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:10     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:18       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 16:24         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 20:08       ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:29     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:30   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 13:26 ` [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 13:33   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21  9:13   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21  9:39     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 11:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 12:14   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 12:35     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 14:02       ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 14:30         ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2019-12-03 10:49         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f9d9b6b-55e5-fe69-d6c2-f7c229b4021a@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).