From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9521BC11F67 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174B861D5F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:48:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 174B861D5F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lyOOq-0004Ck-40 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:48:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lyOOF-0003YK-Rd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:47:43 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:50169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lyOOE-0003aA-4s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:47:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625014060; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0bjbX0L2AQSI61PPcfksUFXXhhSA3NikPOahhNWbgU8=; b=BcTLrSctdcpdlsg33MTU4BgNvEil5kxBdJPbZEOY9VJd/3VoLtO9C2PeEfTwDj3fYsNNhN OWKM58wyXM6nZITrtvP5x+1SRDBYXc8ePcAej89rNH8T5RboeFkw96GqNOTx/fI/vME06V ZnWYT1vO6aN0QL/nyIQ4f2z6J/UIFtI= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-400-hY0NlD0rNGe4JEjhJ0StlA-1; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:47:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hY0NlD0rNGe4JEjhJ0StlA-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id q8-20020a170906a088b02904be5f536463so175906ejy.0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:47:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0bjbX0L2AQSI61PPcfksUFXXhhSA3NikPOahhNWbgU8=; b=tIZJqkHg6XZ/lkyW5y3PgqBH/Nu1Hl3Agb+AQmccJeXhiuRYoq1+X0AnwBT9YGk0eb xjQhJ2hPustvJn0EzJSr41p2YNlrfMfizxqfpy38YbBjrAgI8vkuHySI2GvxFq+JpWOe gOpOT3lnpXDY+tId+dhg7lQkIJiP6/EMSK2S1UW/3AzIARA1JSjOj70ZxMFgjwP6g8AD BRH6ti28Fmaneh31OVR32bNzo/T7WJNcNf33E0CM0gG26zRXhovvXsfoYNPowiXvLfai NHInUUZbvAq/8LexSDyhMd5f3Z3IJOmr1AxL0/NeQ271/WUemABnXQ9qyKR2WshW+bvK 0q6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530m20xlTIAo/Adt4QzTv/CB6R4SGi9KbdXlPLt+k9OvRqAEajAy 9hDQhInRRuNML81ZLSUXKbZyKo43JAnAqcd7+nQZyRfZHZyZ08SmAqcz+hBSG8rx2iAHohYDlWx Uahhjs2A5+8U1yNeZ6UQb3t5Zvu6eRww= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4243:: with SMTP id g3mr26012557edb.118.1625014057618; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:47:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlDVEN8qJWK+Pj4iZjsrGY+G0n7cI53D8kWq2J6nbE1udpV6XeSrAfLndozE4AlIb5P7mtFXaKt2IB7ke3iGc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4243:: with SMTP id g3mr26012531edb.118.1625014057395; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:47:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210608031425.833536-1-crosa@redhat.com> <20210608031425.833536-5-crosa@redhat.com> <9770910a-f586-0b79-395c-7154c4693690@amsat.org> <6f4a0d6a-b306-5c14-1def-483ed9b81fda@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Cleber Rosa Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:47:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] Jobs based on custom runners: add job definitions for QEMU's machines To: Stefan Hajnoczi Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=crosa@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=crosa@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.435, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , "Daniel P . Berrange" , Beraldo Leal , Erik Skultety , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , qemu-devel , Willian Rampazzo , Willian Rampazzo , Andrea Bolognani , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:09 AM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:07:57PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote: > > > And I understand that are a lot of them (from everyone, including > > > myself). The dilemma here is: should we activate the machines already > > > available, and learn in practice, what's missing? I honestly believe we > > > should. > > > > > > IMHO we should merge the minimum possible to start using the existing > > machines, then address the questions (good questions, btw) raised by > > Philippe as needed. > > That sounds good. > > Does anyone want to volunteer to be the QEMU CI runners point of contact > who is responsible for defining the process? Cleber's last email left a > lot for Alex and me to define, but I would prefer it if someone who is > not me takes this on since I'm already spread thin. Alex? Philippe? Cleber? > Wainer? > > Stefan Sure, I can do it. I'll start by resurrecting the now ancient RFC that contains a lot of proposals with regards to the process, in light of the current status and developments: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-12/msg00231.html IMO we can start with documentation (either at ci.rst, or preferably in the WIKI for now) for the process of onboarding new CI runners, and track it with issues in GitLab itself. I'll formalize those opinions. Thanks, - Cleber.