From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-level <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Harpreet Singh Anand <hanand@xilinx.com>,
Xiao W Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Michael Lilja <ml@napatech.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 20/20] vdpa: Add custom IOTLB translations to SVQ
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:02:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtgOc6ccaV5fckMwgEccEwL=sfuvkGymjAsQh7Tvn9krw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWcRcm9rwuTqJHS0FmuMrXpoCvF34TzXKQmxXTfZssZ-jA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:29 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
<eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:25 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 在 2021/10/1 下午3:06, Eugenio Pérez 写道:
> > > Use translations added in VhostIOVATree in SVQ.
> > >
> > > Now every element needs to store the previous address also, so VirtQueue
> > > can consume the elements properly. This adds a little overhead per VQ
> > > element, having to allocate more memory to stash them. As a possible
> > > optimization, this allocation could be avoided if the descriptor is not
> > > a chain but a single one, but this is left undone.
> > >
> > > TODO: iova range should be queried before, and add logic to fail when
> > > GPA is outside of its range and memory listener or svq add it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h | 4 +-
> > > hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 40 ++++++++-
> > > hw/virtio/trace-events | 1 +
> > > 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h
> > > index b7baa424a7..a0e6b5267a 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h
> > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > #define VHOST_SHADOW_VIRTQUEUE_H
> > >
> > > #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
> > > +#include "hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.h"
> > >
> > > typedef struct VhostShadowVirtqueue VhostShadowVirtqueue;
> > >
> > > @@ -28,7 +29,8 @@ bool vhost_svq_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned idx,
> > > void vhost_svq_stop(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned idx,
> > > VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq);
> > >
> > > -VhostShadowVirtqueue *vhost_svq_new(struct vhost_dev *dev, int idx);
> > > +VhostShadowVirtqueue *vhost_svq_new(struct vhost_dev *dev, int idx,
> > > + VhostIOVATree *iova_map);
> > >
> > > void vhost_svq_free(VhostShadowVirtqueue *vq);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > index 2fd0bab75d..9db538547e 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
> > > @@ -11,12 +11,19 @@
> > > #include "hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.h"
> > > #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
> > > #include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
> > > +#include "hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.h"
> > >
> > > #include "standard-headers/linux/vhost_types.h"
> > >
> > > #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> > > #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
> > >
> > > +typedef struct SVQElement {
> > > + VirtQueueElement elem;
> > > + void **in_sg_stash;
> > > + void **out_sg_stash;
> > > +} SVQElement;
> > > +
> > > /* Shadow virtqueue to relay notifications */
> > > typedef struct VhostShadowVirtqueue {
> > > /* Shadow vring */
> > > @@ -46,8 +53,11 @@ typedef struct VhostShadowVirtqueue {
> > > /* Virtio device */
> > > VirtIODevice *vdev;
> > >
> > > + /* IOVA mapping if used */
> > > + VhostIOVATree *iova_map;
> > > +
> > > /* Map for returning guest's descriptors */
> > > - VirtQueueElement **ring_id_maps;
> > > + SVQElement **ring_id_maps;
> > >
> > > /* Next head to expose to device */
> > > uint16_t avail_idx_shadow;
> > > @@ -79,13 +89,6 @@ bool vhost_svq_valid_device_features(uint64_t *dev_features)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > case VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM:
> > > - /* SVQ needs this feature disabled. Can't continue */
> > > - if (*dev_features & BIT_ULL(b)) {
> > > - clear_bit(b, dev_features);
> > > - r = false;
> > > - }
> > > - break;
> > > -
> > > case VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1:
> > > /* SVQ needs this feature, so can't continue */
> > > if (!(*dev_features & BIT_ULL(b))) {
> > > @@ -126,6 +129,64 @@ static void vhost_svq_set_notification(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, bool enable)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void vhost_svq_stash_addr(void ***stash, const struct iovec *iov,
> > > + size_t num)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t i;
> > > +
> > > + if (num == 0) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + *stash = g_new(void *, num);
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> > > + (*stash)[i] = iov[i].iov_base;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void vhost_svq_unstash_addr(void **stash, struct iovec *iov, size_t num)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t i;
> > > +
> > > + if (num == 0) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> > > + iov[i].iov_base = stash[i];
> > > + }
> > > + g_free(stash);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void vhost_svq_translate_addr(const VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > > + struct iovec *iovec, size_t num)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> > > + VhostDMAMap needle = {
> > > + .translated_addr = iovec[i].iov_base,
> > > + .size = iovec[i].iov_len,
> > > + };
> > > + size_t off;
> > > +
> > > + const VhostDMAMap *map = vhost_iova_tree_find_iova(svq->iova_map,
> > > + &needle);
> >
> >
> > Is it possible that we end up with more than one maps here?
> >
>
> Actually it is possible, since there is no guarantee that one
> descriptor (or indirect descriptor) maps exactly to one iov. It could
> map to many if qemu vaddr is not contiguous but GPA + size is. This is
> something that must be fixed for the next revision, so thanks for
> pointing it out!
>
> Taking that into account, the condition that svq vring avail_idx -
> used_idx was always less or equal than guest's vring avail_idx -
> used_idx is not true anymore. Checking for that before adding buffers
> to SVQ is the easy part, but how could we recover in that case?
>
> I think that the easy solution is to check for more available buffers
> unconditionally at the end of vhost_svq_handle_call, which handles the
> SVQ used and is supposed to make more room for available buffers. So
> vhost_handle_guest_kick would not check if eventfd is set or not
> anymore.
>
> Would that make sense?
Yes, I think it should work.
Thanks
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Map cannot be NULL since iova map contains all guest space and
> > > + * qemu already has a physical address mapped
> > > + */
> > > + assert(map);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Map->iova chunk size is ignored. What to do if descriptor
> > > + * (addr, size) does not fit is delegated to the device.
> > > + */
> > > + off = needle.translated_addr - map->translated_addr;
> > > + iovec[i].iov_base = (void *)(map->iova + off);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void vhost_vring_write_descs(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > > const struct iovec *iovec,
> > > size_t num, bool more_descs, bool write)
> > > @@ -156,8 +217,9 @@ static void vhost_vring_write_descs(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > > }
> > >
> > > static unsigned vhost_svq_add_split(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > > - VirtQueueElement *elem)
> > > + SVQElement *svq_elem)
> > > {
> > > + VirtQueueElement *elem = &svq_elem->elem;
> > > int head;
> > > unsigned avail_idx;
> > > vring_avail_t *avail = svq->vring.avail;
> > > @@ -167,6 +229,12 @@ static unsigned vhost_svq_add_split(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > > /* We need some descriptors here */
> > > assert(elem->out_num || elem->in_num);
> > >
> > > + vhost_svq_stash_addr(&svq_elem->in_sg_stash, elem->in_sg, elem->in_num);
> > > + vhost_svq_stash_addr(&svq_elem->out_sg_stash, elem->out_sg, elem->out_num);
> >
> >
> > I wonder if we can solve the trick like stash and unstash with a
> > dedicated sgs in svq_elem, instead of reusing the elem.
> >
>
> Actually yes, it would be way simpler to use a new sgs array in
> svq_elem. I will change that.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > + vhost_svq_translate_addr(svq, elem->in_sg, elem->in_num);
> > > + vhost_svq_translate_addr(svq, elem->out_sg, elem->out_num);
> > > +
> > > vhost_vring_write_descs(svq, elem->out_sg, elem->out_num,
> > > elem->in_num > 0, false);
> > > vhost_vring_write_descs(svq, elem->in_sg, elem->in_num, false, true);
> > > @@ -187,7 +255,7 @@ static unsigned vhost_svq_add_split(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void vhost_svq_add(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, VirtQueueElement *elem)
> > > +static void vhost_svq_add(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, SVQElement *elem)
> > > {
> > > unsigned qemu_head = vhost_svq_add_split(svq, elem);
> > >
> > > @@ -221,7 +289,7 @@ static void vhost_handle_guest_kick(EventNotifier *n)
> > > }
> > >
> > > while (true) {
> > > - VirtQueueElement *elem = virtqueue_pop(svq->vq, sizeof(*elem));
> > > + SVQElement *elem = virtqueue_pop(svq->vq, sizeof(*elem));
> > > if (!elem) {
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > @@ -247,7 +315,7 @@ static bool vhost_svq_more_used(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> > > return svq->used_idx != svq->shadow_used_idx;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static VirtQueueElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> > > +static SVQElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> > > {
> > > vring_desc_t *descs = svq->vring.desc;
> > > const vring_used_t *used = svq->vring.used;
> > > @@ -279,7 +347,7 @@ static VirtQueueElement *vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
> > > descs[used_elem.id].next = svq->free_head;
> > > svq->free_head = used_elem.id;
> > >
> > > - svq->ring_id_maps[used_elem.id]->len = used_elem.len;
> > > + svq->ring_id_maps[used_elem.id]->elem.len = used_elem.len;
> > > return g_steal_pointer(&svq->ring_id_maps[used_elem.id]);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -296,12 +364,19 @@ static void vhost_svq_handle_call_no_test(EventNotifier *n)
> > >
> > > vhost_svq_set_notification(svq, false);
> > > while (true) {
> > > - g_autofree VirtQueueElement *elem = vhost_svq_get_buf(svq);
> > > - if (!elem) {
> > > + g_autofree SVQElement *svq_elem = vhost_svq_get_buf(svq);
> > > + VirtQueueElement *elem;
> > > + if (!svq_elem) {
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > assert(i < svq->vring.num);
> > > + elem = &svq_elem->elem;
> > > +
> > > + vhost_svq_unstash_addr(svq_elem->in_sg_stash, elem->in_sg,
> > > + elem->in_num);
> > > + vhost_svq_unstash_addr(svq_elem->out_sg_stash, elem->out_sg,
> > > + elem->out_num);
> > > virtqueue_fill(vq, elem, elem->len, i++);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -451,14 +526,24 @@ void vhost_svq_stop(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned idx,
> > > event_notifier_set_handler(&svq->host_notifier, NULL);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < svq->vring.num; ++i) {
> > > - g_autofree VirtQueueElement *elem = svq->ring_id_maps[i];
> > > + g_autofree SVQElement *svq_elem = svq->ring_id_maps[i];
> > > + VirtQueueElement *elem;
> > > +
> > > + if (!svq_elem) {
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + elem = &svq_elem->elem;
> > > + vhost_svq_unstash_addr(svq_elem->in_sg_stash, elem->in_sg,
> > > + elem->in_num);
> > > + vhost_svq_unstash_addr(svq_elem->out_sg_stash, elem->out_sg,
> > > + elem->out_num);
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Although the doc says we must unpop in order, it's ok to unpop
> > > * everything.
> > > */
> > > - if (elem) {
> > > - virtqueue_unpop(svq->vq, elem, elem->len);
> > > - }
> > > + virtqueue_unpop(svq->vq, elem, elem->len);
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -466,7 +551,8 @@ void vhost_svq_stop(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned idx,
> > > * Creates vhost shadow virtqueue, and instruct vhost device to use the shadow
> > > * methods and file descriptors.
> > > */
> > > -VhostShadowVirtqueue *vhost_svq_new(struct vhost_dev *dev, int idx)
> > > +VhostShadowVirtqueue *vhost_svq_new(struct vhost_dev *dev, int idx,
> > > + VhostIOVATree *iova_map)
> > > {
> > > int vq_idx = dev->vq_index + idx;
> > > unsigned num = virtio_queue_get_num(dev->vdev, vq_idx);
> > > @@ -500,11 +586,13 @@ VhostShadowVirtqueue *vhost_svq_new(struct vhost_dev *dev, int idx)
> > > memset(svq->vring.desc, 0, driver_size);
> > > svq->vring.used = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size, device_size);
> > > memset(svq->vring.used, 0, device_size);
> > > + svq->iova_map = iova_map;
> > > +
> > > for (i = 0; i < num - 1; i++) {
> > > svq->vring.desc[i].next = cpu_to_le16(i + 1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - svq->ring_id_maps = g_new0(VirtQueueElement *, num);
> > > + svq->ring_id_maps = g_new0(SVQElement *, num);
> > > event_notifier_set_handler(&svq->call_notifier,
> > > vhost_svq_handle_call);
> > > return g_steal_pointer(&svq);
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > index a9c680b487..f5a12fee9d 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > > @@ -176,6 +176,18 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> > > vaddr, section->readonly);
> > >
> > > llsize = int128_sub(llend, int128_make64(iova));
> > > + if (v->shadow_vqs_enabled) {
> > > + VhostDMAMap mem_region = {
> > > + .translated_addr = vaddr,
> > > + .size = int128_get64(llsize) - 1,
> > > + .perm = IOMMU_ACCESS_FLAG(true, section->readonly),
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + int r = vhost_iova_tree_alloc(v->iova_map, &mem_region);
> > > + assert(r == VHOST_DMA_MAP_OK);
> > > +
> > > + iova = mem_region.iova;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_map(v, iova, int128_get64(llsize),
> > > vaddr, section->readonly);
> > > @@ -754,6 +766,23 @@ static bool vhost_vdpa_force_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > > + hwaddr *first, hwaddr *last)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range range;
> > > +
> > > + ret = vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_VDPA_GET_IOVA_RANGE, &range);
> > > + if (ret != 0) {
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + *first = range.first;
> > > + *last = range.last;
> > > + trace_vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(dev, *first, *last);
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * Maps QEMU vaddr memory to device in a suitable way for shadow virtqueue:
> > > * - It always reference qemu memory address, not guest's memory.
> > > @@ -881,6 +910,7 @@ static bool vhost_vdpa_svq_start_vq(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned idx)
> > > static unsigned vhost_vdpa_enable_svq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, bool enable)
> > > {
> > > struct vhost_dev *hdev = v->dev;
> > > + hwaddr iova_first, iova_last;
> > > unsigned n;
> > > int r;
> > >
> > > @@ -894,7 +924,7 @@ static unsigned vhost_vdpa_enable_svq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, bool enable)
> > > /* Allocate resources */
> > > assert(v->shadow_vqs->len == 0);
> > > for (n = 0; n < hdev->nvqs; ++n) {
> > > - VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq = vhost_svq_new(hdev, n);
> > > + VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq = vhost_svq_new(hdev, n, v->iova_map);
> > > if (unlikely(!svq)) {
> > > g_ptr_array_set_size(v->shadow_vqs, 0);
> > > return 0;
> > > @@ -903,6 +933,8 @@ static unsigned vhost_vdpa_enable_svq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, bool enable)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + r = vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(hdev, &iova_first, &iova_last);
> > > + assert(r == 0);
> > > r = vhost_vdpa_vring_pause(hdev);
> > > assert(r == 0);
> > >
> > > @@ -913,6 +945,12 @@ static unsigned vhost_vdpa_enable_svq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, bool enable)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + memory_listener_unregister(&v->listener);
> > > + if (vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(v, iova_first,
> > > + (iova_last - iova_first) & TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
> > > + error_report("Fail to invalidate device iotlb");
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* Reset device so it can be configured */
> > > r = vhost_vdpa_dev_start(hdev, false);
> > > assert(r == 0);
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/trace-events b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > index 8ed19e9d0c..650e521e35 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/trace-events
> > > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ vhost_vdpa_set_vring_call(void *dev, unsigned int index, int fd) "dev: %p index:
> > > vhost_vdpa_get_features(void *dev, uint64_t features) "dev: %p features: 0x%"PRIx64
> > > vhost_vdpa_set_owner(void *dev) "dev: %p"
> > > vhost_vdpa_vq_get_addr(void *dev, void *vq, uint64_t desc_user_addr, uint64_t avail_user_addr, uint64_t used_user_addr) "dev: %p vq: %p desc_user_addr: 0x%"PRIx64" avail_user_addr: 0x%"PRIx64" used_user_addr: 0x%"PRIx64
> > > +vhost_vdpa_get_iova_range(void *dev, uint64_t first, uint64_t last) "dev: %p first: 0x%"PRIx64" last: 0x%"PRIx64
> > >
> > > # virtio.c
> > > virtqueue_alloc_element(void *elem, size_t sz, unsigned in_num, unsigned out_num) "elem %p size %zd in_num %u out_num %u"
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 7:05 [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] vDPA shadow virtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/20] virtio: Add VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/20] virtio-net: Honor VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DEVICE_STOPPED Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/20] virtio: Add virtio_queue_is_host_notifier_enabled Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/20] vhost: Make vhost_virtqueue_{start,stop} public Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/20] vhost: Add x-vhost-enable-shadow-vq qmp Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-12 5:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-12 13:08 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-12 13:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-14 12:01 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/20] vhost: Add VhostShadowVirtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/20] vdpa: Register vdpa devices in a list Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/20] vhost: Route guest->host notification through shadow virtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-12 5:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-12 13:09 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-13 3:27 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 12:00 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 3:45 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 9:08 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 18:21 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/20] vdpa: Save call_fd in vhost-vdpa Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 12:11 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/20] vhost-vdpa: Take into account SVQ in vhost_vdpa_set_vring_call Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 12:18 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/20] vhost: Route host->guest notification through shadow virtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 3:47 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 16:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 4:42 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-19 8:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-20 2:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 6:36 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-13 3:49 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 15:58 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 4:24 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/20] virtio: Add vhost_shadow_vq_get_vring_addr Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 3:54 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 14:39 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/20] vdpa: Save host and guest features Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 3:56 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 15:03 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/20] vhost: Add vhost_svq_valid_device_features to shadow vq Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/20] vhost: Shadow virtqueue buffers forwarding Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-12 5:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-12 13:28 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-12 13:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-14 15:04 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-13 4:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-14 17:56 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 4:23 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 9:33 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:05 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/20] vhost: Check for device VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY at shadow virtqueue kick Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 4:35 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 6:17 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/20] vhost: Use VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT at device call on shadow virtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 4:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 6:22 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/20] vhost: Add VhostIOVATree Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-19 8:32 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-19 9:22 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 7:54 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-20 9:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 12:06 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-21 2:34 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-21 7:03 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-21 8:12 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-21 14:33 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-26 4:29 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 7:36 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-01 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/20] vhost: Use a tree to store memory mappings Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-01 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/20] vdpa: Add custom IOTLB translations to SVQ Eugenio Pérez
2021-10-13 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 7:27 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 7:37 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 8:20 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-15 8:37 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-15 9:14 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-19 9:24 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-19 10:28 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-20 2:02 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-10-20 2:07 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 6:51 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-20 9:03 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-20 11:56 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-10-21 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-26 4:32 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-12 3:59 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/20] vDPA shadow virtqueue Jason Wang
2021-10-12 4:06 ` Jason Wang
2021-10-12 9:09 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACGkMEtgOc6ccaV5fckMwgEccEwL=sfuvkGymjAsQh7Tvn9krw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eli@mellanox.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hanand@xilinx.com \
--cc=ml@napatech.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).