From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B898FC433DF for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81CCC206F0 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="L82PuNDm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 81CCC206F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAm16-0006Hn-QL for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 23:22:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAm0Y-0005t6-N4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 23:21:54 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb43.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b43]:41313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAm0X-0003kL-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 23:21:54 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-xb43.google.com with SMTP id s195so160104ybc.8 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bAZ9m90F6Uij1i6GpKxO4ERbqgUw9KDOp0yI+WeIPz0=; b=L82PuNDmgIMIdw5cRzcoalnxtbpPbMaw+XOSDZqUM+hVGvPzd4qaBiMBr5/+185Z8Z qUpdY6RF4tA5mqH5Eq1mhPzZCA85EB932aPC58s6I7uLz4b5yvJ3/ls7uMlpg6PXw627 cYUGw4WXTZDXDksrLaAsFYYXlqqsuLMSnbPEC3GkQPhFXMcKZMVLxQLzzlD61C01Cek0 sret7EovVoVhnaKEEONSGjoCV65fKTmZa3KclySTJvAm/dF3GlR6DwmjKwt+GbdPKUoc bMwOEmImnT0aZM1uFs0T2OelwCFFKU85y844L4sMhjy8Y/xJxn5R23sFeR1o27xwCydP sXSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bAZ9m90F6Uij1i6GpKxO4ERbqgUw9KDOp0yI+WeIPz0=; b=DXptaVN+s65xWzOOmh6S3BVhXey8GrAFsFJwHg5XjcnfOhvLayj1lC4vafAm9dOyfH XveWykSkIOb9rfAtB8PQ/nGSl381D5nudIBXAtCghK2bLcWtX2Fe325KICcsDp0n3r4Z sbX2TSPJJHyzMDxmHCTSGyPI0LC4aEwZ1VuoA4+Y+kXBxOKXx+NlyXCsjYpwKipMp0Fe Zo+musI6BNgU9gKb+ooP5mPF7HUVdsln2kJUs19mKCpy6t3ksE/7fczcFXcgJn1HzWbe TNrug3b/OiIQeA2kTH0WPKyPWgUgA3WHzO4fl51FfqeRqjZElIDuKcWGQ4GpJ3SM2QPM c4zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ORLZwC0sDnHEnU9EZG61BUFZGUq6UsMqnGjoxeqj4W+E0Ztk7 2rQa2F+n+BHJPi/KEkzHmq3hwmjS6GXhDvSIhSI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVAu4cYtxGbUX9vpXMrDdrClT6WY+dpJ16SNysTcBFrK6L4bclh6gmoYDgoaWV3zvhzi1Mz7XHmydWuz+MVZ4= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3b0d:: with SMTP id i13mr18410987yba.314.1598412111840; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:21:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200825184836.1282371-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bin Meng Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:21:40 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PULL 00/18] riscv-to-apply queue To: Alistair Francis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b43; envelope-from=bmeng.cn@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb43.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Alistair Francis , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:41 AM Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:50 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 22:32, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:24 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > The hypervisor related patches don't seem to have any > > > > reviewed-by tags, which seems a shame for a fairly significant > > > > chunk of work. Is there really nobody who can review them > > > > for you ? > > > > > > Unfortunately not. They have been on the list since April and haven't > > > received any feedback. > > > > > > There isn't a lot of people reviewing the RISC-V patches unfortunately. > > > > :-( I'd hoped it was a more active target than that. > > There are lots of active contributors, we are just short on reviewers. > > Richard and Philippe review patches and some of the RISC-V patches get > reviewed by the RISC-V community. The main problem (which is a common > problem in open source) is that large technical patch series just get > ignored. Yep, I am only comfortable reviewing patches which I have confidence in. Right now I am not working on any H- or V - extension for RISC-V so I cannot contribute to any review of these large numbers of H- or V- extension related patches. Sorry! Regards, Bin