From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDB4C433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 22:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072AC64F74 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 22:53:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 072AC64F74 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l74YC-0000tD-11 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:53:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l74Sq-0001Cx-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:48:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::529]:35567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l74So-0006pw-1C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:48:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id g10so6493539eds.2 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K8p5/6UfE4UJbHAYjEmL3Zo+mFbvNGhGC8gLQUcocc4=; b=oNDoYWI3hNUTR50pR20MMlWSxuoNvM4rOSmiUT5wdtrvX9nWQdEWJKzqA0vcxiYHYG jEf0UHFgOYgqbJo9dry32BQdo0PhT+les1vmzAIoHzcyharoTYRMYpY6VKD0cx+39Jtm 4VwxOBDkUBwm3wulO4XWQlNK79Rt5nclc8xQhUpgYySZa85dqzXqnlsETJRy4lZVugOI 3unE4gHCV2ocPhuP5imk3jZjt72X4akpcuTZfO/fskR2xmFIz9WHIm66WORzDmiCWplL qQiIkw3XBibzRjWcApEAraMHFlM3JHTdfMI9Ew2cSeUpYphBVxvITNEKKb/CqnL/gnG1 w6CQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K8p5/6UfE4UJbHAYjEmL3Zo+mFbvNGhGC8gLQUcocc4=; b=Huju5Rx6nzTN6kVXyT0C6+krUDkYOY0m8vPfMbkC7a81yr1q/J30Ew1r553IJPdL0Q wi3HEjiWQditGA/HHWIs1NazADLnA0A3rY4x7pH5KM7CaVf4D3iM/Pxw/TVW3C3AHAqX T4WGliLvpkdLekaKzSQCqvxRAG/JMCe9Fs7q88dpIymxkN9ZpBb8LVn3AF/3QPveaz2Y uJhZJ2BD232Uu/FDy6Hlm2jWPR4fuoaiU1WYe4OOWQ43bNsF9n/dgCU7bZXlXsBag4JI CshAMNBN+SXRRHwkOBAnDRjPcBnCUslo6peNLvJBDJFbp8v1n4KIkMHiJc86p87clAFE KqQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wXcSE9yoAOr9n4bo5wtEFLi4AnUNQU8Nia2Tfj5xqy/PgfojI 1wL6PSudxU9pZqgkie15xJD6sFB0AzcwotceP+yCyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJnpv9KaL0zlEtg2fBL0L7XMK68pEVs7fGN/yzWQyAEqEms+dUyM1kLlVw0tRaR6k4ZigLWviI2dMLNmNbku8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5107:: with SMTP id m7mr337660edd.52.1612306079546; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:47:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201211183934.169161-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <81abe7dc-6053-72d2-ddf7-352dc21e75b6@redhat.com> <9e71568c-ce4a-f844-fbd3-a4a59f850d74@redhat.com> <20210202162319.GG5184@merkur.fritz.box> <4f3fcae0-49cb-a1fd-4878-118bcc15287a@virtuozzo.com> In-Reply-To: <4f3fcae0-49cb-a1fd-4878-118bcc15287a@virtuozzo.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 22:47:48 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::529; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-ed1-x529.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , Qemu-block , QEMU Developers , Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Denis V. Lunev" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 17:09, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Note that 30 is known to crash sometimes. Look at > > "[PATCH RFC 0/5] Fix accidental crash in iotest 30" > > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20201120161622.1537-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com/ It certainly seems to be the least reliable iotest in my experience. For example it just fell over on ppc64 on MST's latest pullreq merge: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA8aZ6qTLjp00FyqYUwtqk0tAFYUpjW0FeepPMMVfOUbPg@mail.gmail.com/ thanks -- PMM