From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCW-0000bs-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCV-0005c5-Kr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:08 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:34891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSoCV-0005bu-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:07 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e6so97782831vkh.2 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 07:58:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1454256948-10485-1-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> <1454256948-10485-2-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:57:47 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] cpu: Add callback to check architectural watchpoint match List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sergey Fedorov Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , QEMU Developers , qemu-arm , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Richard Henderson On 8 February 2016 at 15:42, Peter Maydell wrote: > Andreas -- can I nudge you to say your preferences on whether > QOM CPU methods should have wrapper functions, please? > I think this patchset is otherwise ready to apply. Andreas tells me on IRC that he doesn't insist on wrapper functions, so I think this patch is fine as is. thanks -- PMM