qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@huawei.com>
Cc: "Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/arm/virt: Add FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE and FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS into fw_cfg
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 12:32:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8ZRufe+6P1kj8iSc40EEWohjA_FMscxjmNLJrPPQyn-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203122753.19792-5-zhengxiang9@huawei.com>

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 12:29, Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether it's neccesary to add FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE and
> FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS into fw_cfg on virt machine. This patch just makes
> the fw_cfg-test happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index d4bedc2607..26a4183775 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,9 @@ static FWCfgState *create_fw_cfg(const VirtMachineState *vms, AddressSpace *as)
>      fw_cfg = fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, base + 16, as);
>      fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, (uint16_t)ms->smp.cpus);
>
> +    fw_cfg_add_i64(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE, (uint64_t)ram_size);
> +    fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS, (uint16_t)ms->smp.max_cpus);
> +
>      nodename = g_strdup_printf("/fw-cfg@%" PRIx64, base);
>      qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vms->fdt, nodename);
>      qemu_fdt_setprop_string(vms->fdt, nodename,
> --

Is there a spec anywhere that defines the meaning of these
FW_CFG entries ? docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt defines the
device interface but not what the 'standard' keys mean.
I'd prefer not to add them to the virt board without knowing
what they mean and why we have them.

thanks
-- PMM


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-03 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03 12:27 [PATCH 0/5] tests: Enable fw_cfg tests on AArch64 Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] tests: fw_cfg: Rename pc_fw_cfg_* to fw_cfg_* Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:34   ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-04  6:13     ` Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] tests: fw_cfg: Support read/write of fw_cfg registers on aarch64 Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] tests: fw_cfg: Use virt as default machine in fw_cfg-test.c Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/arm/virt: Add FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE and FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS into fw_cfg Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:32   ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2019-12-04  6:14     ` Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 12:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests: Enable fw_cfg test on aarch64 Xiang Zheng
2019-12-03 13:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] tests: Enable fw_cfg tests on AArch64 Thomas Huth
2019-12-04  6:18   ` Xiang Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFEAcA8ZRufe+6P1kj8iSc40EEWohjA_FMscxjmNLJrPPQyn-A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengxiang9@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).