From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA5EC33CAD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD89D20678 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="xMaFR1V1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CD89D20678 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48186 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwl6-0007fX-UC for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:15:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwkO-00079I-KV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwkN-00054P-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:15:00 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]:39364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwkN-00053L-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:14:59 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id a67so7726936oib.6 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 02:14:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PMegUXs6T3N3bWEvV7aKC2ycNG7aRMU5M68hG92ENW8=; b=xMaFR1V14JAO0CEA6GUPe25y6Nd3uU+aUMnrGyXBKV4b+jg4aL9xZzfKPtAFmDSWTh e6oGhdDZYSnwM1Nm282By1w7+BnFKvRf2LdkoROhZDG6Ozl9N51DYzGxLgEYwSvwyJJl knQ7ZpXEiduhfCfyTCGRmNftLIezsEVDPmsspAHAyBCUqgIjJ0BUvV7vvEt08Mw7nlBC fvnfqZPUcZJ/W3SK8gohpJDZ5NxMCe9K4YmKV5L4V/2oX1XsytF43/v8k4RLV0qSszEq wMZA9tmcAJfDyAL8Ex0NtehQxadln2ytZjvSBsROQHmrGl6hoLEUljsAWUBKjrQVhnsv 3UxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PMegUXs6T3N3bWEvV7aKC2ycNG7aRMU5M68hG92ENW8=; b=PTfNVEXEBbA2+eugWMdx4XrbbY0EFrWiCb1xBvgSI24MSt0b1BZajEu93iqJcIPYh/ Rb7atYvrY97CA/K1Puu2WpDiU3PT7dOtMNGHZ9H4TTOK/K7pt5tbE06/M/+N/taS1uep /ApBEmMXslhazzYc022HiqpRMvoWAJA0nwYU99AxTagcJ0oargeHmEio1/U8UxUfK+Tm MMSJKPaogdilaoNZfQv+WNQKK01xI9rD2UpWzX7B0qxe7LgcLS0aAMqezVDVYmFrMG36 YXWJO2qEzjJNw3DuzfJOtZk247753dtcsz+TO1GVFoUl8nfTSGUdU95KS8MYSigwd1V/ v6LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWq/HSqOwvLbMQRwzJWEsYmZ+2Xk5KNLqLiDpEs3ZSNSmNE3s7R u+OkHzAVKN54SxUWcV53n6Ls8D+xW4gyBfRvAHaTtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyd6R6wvJEFyTKWlS20FXHn3iYSo/NHVZRAgyPL9R9CF5a+nPWeoSaQsn0C00U+U1spB8s7VmNQMwohw/zuZBQ= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d78b:: with SMTP id o133mr12313461oig.163.1578910498023; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 02:14:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <157709434917.12933.4351155074716553976.stgit@pasha-Precision-3630-Tower> <003a01d5c6b3$df62afd0$9e280f70$@ru> <20200109120038.GD9504@linux.fritz.box> <87k15v1z71.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <000f01d5c9f4$cfbc1230$6f343690$@ru> <20200113100648.GB5549@linux.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20200113100648.GB5549@linux.fritz.box> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:14:47 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [for-5.0 PATCH 00/11] Support for reverse debugging with GDB To: Kevin Wolf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::244 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Artem Pisarenko , Peter Crosthwaite , Ciro Santilli , Jason Wang , Juan Quintela , Thomas Dullien , Markus Armbruster , QEMU Developers , Pavel Dovgalyuk , maria.klimushenkova@ispras.ru, Pavel Dovgalyuk , Gerd Hoffmann , Pavel Dovgaluk , Igor R , Paolo Bonzini , Max Reitz , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:07, Kevin Wolf wrote: > In MAINTAINERS, you are listed yourself as the maintainer for > record/replay. I wonder whether you shouldn't just be sending pull > requests after getting Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the maintainers of > other subsystems you touch. Ideally somebody else should be interested enough in record/replay to review patches. "I'm a subsystem maintainer and send pull requests" ideally shouldn't be something we give out just because patches aren't getting code review, though I know that it does sometimes degenerate into that... thanks -- PMM