qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: getting the console output for s390 cdrom-test?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:05:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA99R8Fc1+S2SS31KAA8tsGx-BSgP5FaH37fYeE4gJa0Sw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97770e1f-0b18-98fb-5b65-4211ff5465f7@redhat.com>

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 11:45, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> I guess Cornelia simply meant a:
>
>  asm volatile("nop":::"memory");

That will force the compiler not to reorder, but it doesn't
seem to me that it would really force the memory accesses to
appear to the other host CPU thread that's running the device
emulation. So either it's insufficient in the s390 memory model,
or our s390 emulation isn't being sufficiently rigorous about
implementing the memory model...

> Anyway, I've now succeeded in getting my hands on an aarch64 host and tried
> to reproduce the issue, but even after running it in a loop like this:
>
>   for ((x=0;x<200;x++)) ; do \
>    QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-s390x tests/qtest/cdrom-test \
>    || break ; \
>   done
>
> ... I was not able to reproduce the issue. What kind of host distro are you
> using there? Could the exact host CPU type matter here, too? (I was running
> my code on an HPE Apollo system, with Fedora 33, gcc 10.2)

I expect the host CPU type matters a lot, yes. dmesg reports it
as "cavium,thunder-88xx", with 96 cores.

thanks
-- PMM


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 20:32 getting the console output for s390 cdrom-test? Peter Maydell
2021-02-04 16:08 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-08 10:27   ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-08 11:34     ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-08 12:08       ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-09 14:58         ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-09 17:10           ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-09 17:17             ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-09 17:24               ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-09 18:25                 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-12 11:44                   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-12 12:05                     ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2021-02-12 14:10                       ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFEAcA99R8Fc1+S2SS31KAA8tsGx-BSgP5FaH37fYeE4gJa0Sw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).