From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D35CA9EC0 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C529E21783 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="uAibY66C" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C529E21783 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6xo-00081J-Ga for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:29:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6qj-0008O4-69 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:22:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6lP-0006Rm-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:17:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]:41413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6lP-0006P1-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:16:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 94so6918558oty.8 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:16:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b3W8+Qp16hmsb7/JhtK8PXuOeb3m3ErHdyA5OPSEtIk=; b=uAibY66Cn5eqjLRfWcMvqp6bm84T/njNNWYsekP/MKFcRDuKTn6JlJTDmvhB+ZuMVC JqY1mF24mP+Q01BlOdZpS47rfjlTzUC54gSN589nwK50xAPrMwmbVnFVa5GbudhTXsO8 3Jjq72jE17k85mdGDAVVued3ug04Jg8/PwdJOsw8e7RcgD5BmZQjh5uDcOrr4qKXoDSI I2HivvV1/6Kl26NEnNvzsASBXDkN+tqOMtYG2Moeg+VFEaJOiB1YAZR/jRA4s4CG6dVO df7akOVvV5rMiJzF0FHqEtzyf3kyutnWGOg3GFzLLN/8dCgxz6RBJTOvBKNNgO3YI+e7 tAdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b3W8+Qp16hmsb7/JhtK8PXuOeb3m3ErHdyA5OPSEtIk=; b=K3aY7pUrpbF/weSXw9Am93EDEJI7oyXk6gnsG+lgM3BLZwaLvWBX/eEtV0+Ki5ceCI xxnPMx1y0XufMBxMvQ6tlmL7Q+7XtlKsNrVXPVeKfHrjoX4qN4H6vC4f1tzYTjaTpMPg 7NHqNtnZqExyaY35z4dGHpuyRp0MZx9kUKHaFjhui56xjWCOeCFLO1r1Cx/Oc/b0Wj8k Wyfqla19ayhXTssUwtkLOKqiUSCreSbdKd36skvhcf5EBX/hrkCipF/x0Z9vgGd24X79 Um5fWmFfXmLp+gW9hqWObT9Ip0o1+1dysvQYNZFJ5HhRjlC39ZoI/Zkk+ojAsnV84Grc 6tLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVImPS64WIc2EyUjQ40p9JSsP3TTEOfuBksHc2SH5DcEeyEvson M8WJNWgG1ITU8a0Gau5Ttg0hZtwAEe7HRFyH7qLzXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqqKJhg7rD9h45FcQj/MOCW1kI8o9v8PwLEaiJloqU8FA8MBujZefHAT4c+ZPqFdOMOqMj8n8/SIENvz5VnJ0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7385:: with SMTP id j5mr4039306otk.135.1572275817240; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191026032447.20088-1-zhengxiang9@huawei.com> <20191027061450-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <6c44268a-2676-3fa1-226d-29877b21dbea@huawei.com> <20191028042645-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1edda59a-8b3d-1eec-659a-05356d55ed22@huawei.com> <20191028104834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:16:56 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 0/5] Add ARMv8 RAS virtualization support in QEMU To: gengdongjiu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::342 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , kvm-devel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti , QEMU Developers , Linuxarm , Shannon Zhao , Xiang Zheng , qemu-arm , James Morse , "xuwei \(O\)" , Jonathan Cameron , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, Laszlo Ersek , Igor Mammedov , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 15:11, gengdongjiu wrote: > > On 2019/10/28 22:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:50:21PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> Hi Michael, > >> > >> On 2019/10/28 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>> gets some testing. I'll leave this decision to the ARM maintainer. For > >>>>> ACPI parts: > >>>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > >>>> Got it, Thanks for the Reviewed-by from Michael. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Michael, > >>>> According to discussion with QEMU community, I finished and developed the whole ARM RAS virtualization solution, and introduce the ARM APEI table in the first time. > >>>> For the newly created files, which are mainly about ARM APEI/GHES part,I would like to maintain them. If you agree it, whether I can add new maintainers[1]? thanks a lot. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1]: > >>>> +ARM APEI Subsystem > >>>> +M: Dongjiu Geng > >>>> +M: Xiang zheng > >>>> +L: qemu-arm@nongnu.org > >>>> +S: Maintained > >>>> +F: hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c > >>>> > >>> I think for now you want to be a designated reviewer. So I'd use an R: > >>> tag. > >> > >> Thanks for the reply. > >> I want to be a maintainer for my newly created files, so whether I can use M: tag. I would like to contribute some time to maintain that, thanks a lot. > > > > This will fundamentally be up to Peter. > > Thanks. > > Hi Peter, > what do you think about it? I suggest you just use R: for the moment. The code will all end up going through my tree or perhaps Michael's anyway, so it doesn't make much practical difference. thanks -- PMM