From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZiuD-00021q-JP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:43:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZiuC-0005IP-OX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:43:49 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]:36121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZiuC-0005IL-Hi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:43:48 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c3so102482287vkb.3 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:43:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D1D566.1010400@tribudubois.net> References: <56D1D566.1010400@tribudubois.net> From: Peter Maydell Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:43:28 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/9] i.MX: Add i.MX6 System Reset Controller device. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS Cc: QEMU Developers , Peter Crosthwaite On 27 February 2016 at 16:57, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote: > Hi Peter and Peter, > > I need to test that the changes I did for PSCI (factor out on/off code) do > not introduce any regression. > > On which QEMU target should I test my changes to PSCI to check I didn't mess > up anything? The 'virt' board uses PSCI. thanks -- PMM