qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	"open list:RISC-V" <qemu-riscv@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] target/riscv: Implement the stval/mtval illegal instruction
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:48:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKNDLcp22Jqe=UhE6sG3XEMd2pcW5bfFDYwpwrOL3kb0iA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538d9688-0f2f-c406-50a5-d962e3ce2963@linaro.org>

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:48 PM Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 9/8/21 6:54 AM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > @@ -967,6 +967,16 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >               write_tval  = true;
> >               tval = env->badaddr;
> >               break;
> > +        case RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST:
> > +            if (riscv_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MTVAL_INST)) {
> > +                /*
> > +                 * The stval/mtval register can optionally also be used to
> > +                 * return the faulting instruction bits on an illegal
> > +                 * instruction exception.
> > +                 */
> > +                tval = env->bins;
> > +            }
> > +            break;
>
> I'll note that write_tval should probably be renamed, and/or eliminated, because it looks
> like it's incorrectly unset here.  If you move the adjustment to cause above this switch,
> then you can move the RVH code that needed write_tval into this switch (just the
> HSTATUS_GVA update?).
>
> But... more specific to this case.  Prior to this, was the exception handler allowed to
> assume anything about the contents of stval?  Should the value have been zero?  Would it
> be wrong to write to stval unconditionally?  How does the guest OS know that it can rely
> on stval being set?

As we didn't support writing the illegal instruction stval should be
zero before this patch.

>
> I simply wonder whether it's worthwhile to add the feature and feature test.

Do you just mean have it enabled all the time?

Alistair

>
>
> r~


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08  4:54 [PATCH v2 0/3] RISC-V: Populate mtval and stval Alistair Francis
2021-09-08  4:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] target/riscv: Set the opcode in DisasContext Alistair Francis
2021-09-08  5:42   ` Bin Meng
2021-09-08  6:27   ` Richard Henderson
2021-09-08  4:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] target/riscv: Implement the stval/mtval illegal instruction Alistair Francis
2021-09-08  5:53   ` Bin Meng
2021-09-08  6:48   ` Richard Henderson
2021-09-24  6:48     ` Alistair Francis [this message]
2021-09-24 12:57       ` Richard Henderson
2021-09-29  3:56         ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-08  4:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] target/riscv: Set mtval and stval support Alistair Francis
2021-09-08  5:55   ` Bin Meng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKmqyKNDLcp22Jqe=UhE6sG3XEMd2pcW5bfFDYwpwrOL3kb0iA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).