qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, f4bug@amsat.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com>,
	amarkovic@wavecomp.com, crosa@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh test
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:59:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1e-=gf-DOrdfN__Bxbx+B5NKu71ZTCypGEekoFc05WDaQjbw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1e-=iZziwdyjJeaE-ZC2Rbjdmr_enYGBdK5zs4Lh0kN1DQOg@mail.gmail.com>

22.08.2019. 05.15, "Aleksandar Markovic" <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> је
написао/ла:
>
>
> 21.08.2019. 23.00, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com> је написао/ла:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > 02.08.2019. 17.37, "Aleksandar Markovic" <
aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com> је
> > > написао/ла:
> > > >
> > > > From: Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
> > > >
> > > > This little series improves linux_ssh_mips_malta.py, both in the
sense
> > > > of code organization and in the sense of quantity of executed tests.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hello, all.
> > >
> > > I am going to send a new version in few days, and I have a question
for
> > > test team:
> > >
> > > Currently, the outcome of the script execition is either PASS:1
FAIL:0 or
> > > PASS:0 FAIL:1. But the test actually consists of several subtests. Is
there
> > > any way that this single Python script considers these subtests as
separate
> > > tests (test cases), reporting something like PASS:12 FAIL:7? If yes,
what
> > > would be the best way to achieve that?
> >
> > If you are talking about each test_*() method, they are already
> > treated like separate tests.  If you mean treating each
> > ssh_command_output_contains() call as a separate test, this might
> > be difficult.
> >
>
> Yes, I meant the latter one, individual code segments involving an
invocation of ssh_command_output_contains() instance being treated as
separate tests.
>

Hello, Cleber,

I am willing to rewamp python file structure if needed.

The only thing I feel a little unconfortable is if I need to reboot the
virtual machine for each case of ssh_command_output_contains().

Grateful in advance,
Aleksandar

> > Cleber, is there something already available in the Avocado API
> > that would help us report more fine-grained results inside each
> > test case?
> >
>
> Thanks, that would be a better way of expressing my question.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Aleksandar
> > >
> > > > Aleksandar Markovic (2):
> > > >   tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in
> > > >     linux_ssh_mips_malta.py
> > > >   tests/acceptance: Add new test cases in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py
> > > >
> > > >  tests/acceptance/linux_ssh_mips_malta.py | 81
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Eduardo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 15:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh test Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-02 15:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-02 15:58   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-28 20:58   ` Cleber Rosa
2019-08-02 15:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests/acceptance: Add new test cases " Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-28 21:27   ` Cleber Rosa
2019-08-21 20:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh test Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-21 21:00   ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-08-22  3:15     ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-22 17:59       ` Aleksandar Markovic [this message]
2019-08-26 19:52         ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-28 21:24         ` Cleber Rosa
2019-08-29 18:20           ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-29 17:55 ` Eduardo Habkost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL1e-=gf-DOrdfN__Bxbx+B5NKu71ZTCypGEekoFc05WDaQjbw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com \
    --cc=amarkovic@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).