On Sunday, December 1, 2019, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Aleksandar
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:15 PM Aleksandar Markovic
> <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, December 1, 2019, Marc-André Lureau <
> marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> - "RFC: mips/cps: fix setting saar property"
> >>
> >> Perhaps I should have used FIX instead of RFC, because this should
> >> actually be a real fix. However I could use someone help to exercise
> >> the code path.
> >>
> >
> > Marc-André, hi.
> >
> > There is a work in progress on fixing this. Can we in MIPS submit the
> fix independently, since it involves some additional pieces of code that
> are really deeply mips-specific? We acknowledge the bug, and want to
> develop the real solution. Can you simply skip this RFC patch in your
> series, since the issues will be handled separately in our patch, hopefully
> soon after the merge window is open?
> >
> > For all other mips parts of your series, you have my "reviewed-by"s , in
> case I forgot to send them explicitely.
> >
>
> This is a one-liner, and it is required to achieve the goal of the
> series, to remove PROP_PTR.
>
> If you prefer, I can instead comment the line with a FIXME, since it
> is apparently broken anyway?
>
> If you manage to get your fix merged earlier, then this patch can be
> dropped. Else, is it a problem for the later fixes?
>
>
OK, Marc-André,

Please go ahead with this patch, so that the goal of the series is
achieved, and we will later submitt a wider patch that will address the
root cause. Just remove RFC from subject, everything else looks fine to me.
You can add my "reviewed-by".

Yours, Aleksandar




> thanks
>
>
> --
> Marc-André Lureau
>