From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1261FC4338F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F3860F4B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:16:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B2F3860F4B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41012 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9X3o-0004eG-Rv for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:16:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9X2B-0003Al-RU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:14:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:50993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9X29-0001Z0-1l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:14:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1627668895; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jHbEGFQV9FKpMNBqnQHlCYb5cXEfSMu/IvDihbBEC9Q=; b=L15naFTcXjjGV6rEqapEMEmC0mATs3bwgyq93YgBWJ/PgpPLe0FC3nK82BO4fC9nTtiT/k U7xvTOBZy1pew+BfGVmdH/kpVBkA8y72T8zNjRyJXkg8LQ9RG9zUMrYTndaW5t9G3HXQcx c4XXjLdOPB1Js1FhhYViG88BpP04QK8= Received: from mail-oi1-f197.google.com (mail-oi1-f197.google.com [209.85.167.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-453-_PvDmJ3aNWyUY2yMSnFs0A-1; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:14:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _PvDmJ3aNWyUY2yMSnFs0A-1 Received: by mail-oi1-f197.google.com with SMTP id v128-20020aca61860000b029025c02a6228cso4848556oib.21 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date :message-id:cc:subject:from:to:references:in-reply-to; bh=jHbEGFQV9FKpMNBqnQHlCYb5cXEfSMu/IvDihbBEC9Q=; b=V5xs+otHr7qdpLJNgE+TcSqLTfsDNJlKnAvuP4e8fhnjku28y1bJh6A68+D+AFYxdD ThxUi5PtmxsnttAM1/HGFjDN2Qp4rqkSoN+EzvLuh/qQrCNjFJegLGY2C6HGdsCOMNmw zmw18HGVc8lDFHP/fhdLNAFtFw+U5Eoa+2kfZfOaxH7TjuN1ZJCtHZ4zQvBNjGvnVwH8 FxRcuSJqc8cdzVzjvTF7ydZlfnptx2G0eYshSdkuHysO43WzRHrfd4zOxTxITxrtePkw DiYF11bob8sMabDx/t7jrEz9UQR5s25HoiRrKwIUrmCTgxEdOpHFvInc/xi4X+ULyDtx a6yA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qh6nFJn38AUs9uimviKas1K1E6WENRqSX4iGLMYZq9xJBcRkW SessV4afrn/2iNvvI1c3iwawX1fAHDJ2H24M9RWgz+fvHdTFYOZwPz3LVBAum+mDoVL5aoVdIAb L7DXEfLLbQvfPgY4= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5381:: with SMTP id w1mr3010662otg.259.1627668893459; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:14:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziJ7W9TQTGZRTpeleOj0Cz+bbvZ0uyQtCnAjC8zipuPhxDxpKJKDHQ75/bFrFw0K+dueFOTw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5381:: with SMTP id w1mr3010644otg.259.1627668893254; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip68-103-222-15.ks.ok.cox.net. [68.103.222.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm395581oiw.19.2021.07.30.11.14.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:14:51 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/sev: Measured Linux SEV guest with kernel/initrd/cmdline From: "Connor Kuehl" To: "Dov Murik" , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , "Paolo Bonzini" References: <20210624102040.2015280-1-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com> <2dc6c60e-48f8-7c6f-6131-0bc1020e106f@redhat.com> <05d0ae90-a45f-157b-d37c-942bc0442449@redhat.com> <203b655c-809b-b418-f61c-982e587fa9f2@linux.ibm.com> <8af634e5-34be-1532-3afb-75ec4306fc87@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8af634e5-34be-1532-3afb-75ec4306fc87@linux.ibm.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ckuehl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 1 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ckuehl@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.717, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tom Lendacky , Ashish Kalra , Brijesh Singh , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , James Bottomley , Richard Henderson , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Jim Cadden , Laszlo Ersek Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri Jul 30, 2021 at 1:02 PM CDT, Dov Murik wrote: > > > > Awesome! Unfortunately, it's looking like we'll have to wait[1] for QEM= U to > > thaw before this series goes in. > >=20 > > Thanks for explaining this. Do I need to do anything after 6.1 is > released? Ping? Rebase and re-send? Rebase and re-send. I think your patches already have the Reviewed-by tags in the patch descriptions, but if that's not the case, make sure you add them for the re-send so it's obvious that the patches have already been reviewed. Thank you, Connor