Re: [PATCH 3/3] hw/block/nvme: report non-mdts command size limit for dsm

[Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5896 bytes --]

On Feb 22 21:11, Minwoo Im wrote:
> On 21-02-22 08:06:15, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > From: Gollu Appalanaidu <anaidu.gollu@samsung.com>
> > 
> > Dataset Management is not subject to MDTS, but exceeded a certain size
> > per range causes internal looping. Report this limit (DMRSL) in the NVM
> > command set specific identify controller data structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gollu Appalanaidu <anaidu.gollu@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/block/nvme.h       |  1 +
> >  include/block/nvme.h  | 11 +++++++++++
> >  hw/block/nvme.c       | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  hw/block/trace-events |  1 +
> >  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.h b/hw/block/nvme.h
> > index cb2b5175f1a1..3046b82b3da1 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/nvme.h
> > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.h
> > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeCtrl {
> >      int         aer_queued;
> >  
> >      uint8_t     zasl;
> > +    uint32_t    dmrsl;
> >  
> >      NvmeSubsystem   *subsys;
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/block/nvme.h b/include/block/nvme.h
> > index b23f3ae2279f..16d8c4c90f7e 100644
> > --- a/include/block/nvme.h
> > +++ b/include/block/nvme.h
> > @@ -1041,6 +1041,16 @@ typedef struct NvmeIdCtrlZoned {
> >      uint8_t     rsvd1[4095];
> >  } NvmeIdCtrlZoned;
> >  
> > +typedef struct NvmeIdCtrlNvm {
> > +    uint8_t     vsl;
> > +    uint8_t     wzsl;
> > +    uint8_t     wusl;
> > +    uint8_t     dmrl;
> > +    uint32_t    dmrsl;
> > +    uint64_t    dmsl;
> > +    uint8_t     rsvd16[4080];
> > +} NvmeIdCtrlNvm;
> > +
> >  enum NvmeIdCtrlOacs {
> >      NVME_OACS_SECURITY  = 1 << 0,
> >      NVME_OACS_FORMAT    = 1 << 1,
> > @@ -1396,6 +1406,7 @@ static inline void _nvme_check_size(void)
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeEffectsLog) != 4096);
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeIdCtrl) != 4096);
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeIdCtrlZoned) != 4096);
> > +    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeIdCtrlNvm) != 4096);
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeLBAF) != 4);
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeLBAFE) != 16);
> >      QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(NvmeIdNs) != 4096);
> > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > index 897b9ff0db91..5d6bba5fcb0d 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > @@ -1777,6 +1777,10 @@ static uint16_t nvme_dsm(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> >              trace_pci_nvme_dsm_deallocate(nvme_cid(req), nvme_nsid(ns), slba,
> >                                            nlb);
> >  
> > +            if (nlb > n->dmrsl) {
> > +                trace_pci_nvme_dsm_single_range_limit_exceeded(nlb, n->dmrsl);
> > +            }
> > +
> >              offset = nvme_l2b(ns, slba);
> >              len = nvme_l2b(ns, nlb);
> >  
> > @@ -3202,21 +3206,24 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> >  static uint16_t nvme_identify_ctrl_csi(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> >  {
> >      NvmeIdentify *c = (NvmeIdentify *)&req->cmd;
> > -    NvmeIdCtrlZoned id = {};
> > +    uint8_t id[NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE] = {};
> >  
> >      trace_pci_nvme_identify_ctrl_csi(c->csi);
> >  
> > -    if (c->csi == NVME_CSI_NVM) {
> > -        return nvme_rpt_empty_id_struct(n, req);
> > -    } else if (c->csi == NVME_CSI_ZONED) {
> > -        if (n->params.zasl_bs) {
> > -            id.zasl = n->zasl;
> > -        }
> > -        return nvme_dma(n, (uint8_t *)&id, sizeof(id),
> > -                        DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, req);
> > +    switch (c->csi) {
> > +    case NVME_CSI_NVM:
> > +        ((NvmeIdCtrlNvm *)&id)->dmrsl = cpu_to_le32(n->dmrsl);
> > +        break;
> > +
> > +    case NVME_CSI_ZONED:
> > +        ((NvmeIdCtrlZoned *)&id)->zasl = n->zasl;
> 
> Question.  Are we okay without checking this like above ? :)
> 
> 	if (n->params.zasl_bs) {
> 		((NvmeIdCtrlZoned *)&id)->zasl = n->zasl;
> 	}
> 

Ah yeah. Thanks!

I forgot about that zasl_bs vs zasl quirkiness.

> > +        break;
> > +
> > +    default:
> > +        return NVME_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_DNR;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    return NVME_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_DNR;
> > +    return nvme_dma(n, id, sizeof(id), DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, req);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static uint16_t nvme_identify_ns(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> > @@ -4670,6 +4677,9 @@ int nvme_register_namespace(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeNamespace *ns, Error **errp)
> >  
> >      n->namespaces[nsid - 1] = ns;
> >  
> > +    n->dmrsl = MIN_NON_ZERO(n->dmrsl,
> > +                            BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES / nvme_l2b(ns, 1));
> > +
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/hw/block/trace-events b/hw/block/trace-events
> > index 1f958d09d2a9..27940fe2e98a 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/trace-events
> > +++ b/hw/block/trace-events
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ pci_nvme_copy_cb(uint16_t cid) "cid %"PRIu16""
> >  pci_nvme_block_status(int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, int64_t pnum, int ret, bool zeroed) "offset %"PRId64" bytes %"PRId64" pnum %"PRId64" ret 0x%x zeroed %d"
> >  pci_nvme_dsm(uint16_t cid, uint32_t nsid, uint32_t nr, uint32_t attr) "cid %"PRIu16" nsid %"PRIu32" nr %"PRIu32" attr 0x%"PRIx32""
> >  pci_nvme_dsm_deallocate(uint16_t cid, uint32_t nsid, uint64_t slba, uint32_t nlb) "cid %"PRIu16" nsid %"PRIu32" slba %"PRIu64" nlb %"PRIu32""
> > +pci_nvme_dsm_single_range_limit_exceeded(uint32_t nlb, uint32_t dmrsl) "nlb %"PRIu32" dmrsl %"PRIu32""
> >  pci_nvme_compare(uint16_t cid, uint32_t nsid, uint64_t slba, uint32_t nlb) "cid %"PRIu16" nsid %"PRIu32" slba 0x%"PRIx64" nlb %"PRIu32""
> >  pci_nvme_compare_cb(uint16_t cid) "cid %"PRIu16""
> >  pci_nvme_aio_discard_cb(uint16_t cid) "cid %"PRIu16""
> > -- 
> > 2.30.1
> > 
> > 

-- 
One of us - No more doubt, silence or taboo about mental illness.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]