From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31FEC433DB for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ABA64E77 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:33:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 66ABA64E77 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:55806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEF5U-0006p3-Ax for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:33:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEF3S-0003kb-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:31:30 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEF3Q-00086m-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:31:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614015087; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Nv0jL9tkfIg7jT5q/LRCJnaUWmjmfK3JamE/WU9Jb94=; b=i4NuzCwyRUXFI3u9F1fii+XcKZtStc7lQWYjfXHsR52GNct3z9KIrmL4sNb9YEdgCaUiDX VUGSc2HCEoYUHPXDe/7dUy62zlDWo8gDRUrfEi/pOJjGPdUvWjy6zAca+DDfjw8esoVCOR A9RusC/90bb968r1PdXRa9SafXDH7Hg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-393-OxygkYeePGSYusJbKHdfyw-1; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:31:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OxygkYeePGSYusJbKHdfyw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50111020C27; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-115-70.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874EF100239F; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:30:50 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Boris Fiuczynski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] hw/s390x: modularize virtio-gpu-ccw Message-ID: References: <20210222125548.346166-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Bruce Rogers , Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Gerd Hoffmann , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:18:57PM +0100, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > Paolo, Daniel, > I am in general (s390 unrelated) a bit puzzled about the scenario of QEMU > being modularized. > Libvirt probes QEMU executables for their capabilities and creates a > capabilities cache of the probed QEMU binary. There are a few triggers that > invalidate the cache. One is the QEMU binary changing. > Is there one for QEMU modules being installed or uninstalled? > How is that supposed to work? Libvirt doesn't check the modules specifically, but it does look at the mtime on the directory containing modules, and that should be touched when a moduled is added/removed. This is since libvirt 6.8.0 or later. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|