From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C87C433B4 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C727F60FE9 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:31:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C727F60FE9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gibson.dropbear.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRozm-0000Db-KK for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:31:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRoyu-00088H-Ic; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:30:56 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([2401:3900:2:1::2]:53013 helo=ozlabs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRoyr-0002D4-FE; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:30:56 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 4F9qxL1GMrz9sWF; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:30:46 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1617251446; bh=EZUv+EJQ1QATvYanC1K6159Y7gdkfI6GYJxbbojOrDE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bh5PnL7JRLV2T/7fVFdX8FgLtHLR3UZQ5qVXgnLHIbt65AX7igRsCoLYKhRB64epm SPcnOGwoUtqfV+jkvHLlzUuugj6udXwzTPHdAffvwAVr8dtwp+ilNKiAiZgxu6gXe0 pKAwSpjY3zbOvjkPL3JkqvlDt5QZomITuvTUrkjs= Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:17:04 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] target/ppc: Disconnect hflags from MSR Message-ID: References: <20210323184340.619757-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20210329150522.1b00607d@bahia.lan> <20210331060427.16984110@bahia.lan> <962e1ff8-50f8-bea6-7aab-850a16ede116@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aAVdPbqhL9qQEENY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <962e1ff8-50f8-bea6-7aab-850a16ede116@linaro.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2401:3900:2:1::2; envelope-from=dgibson@ozlabs.org; helo=ozlabs.org X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ivan Warren , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --aAVdPbqhL9qQEENY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:31:25PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 3/30/21 10:47 PM, David Gibson wrote: > > Richard - the remaining possible problem with the hflags stuff seems > > to manifest with the assert failing in the last patch. However, I'm > > guess that's just exposing some more subtle problem introduced by an > > earlier patch. Any chance you could re-order the series to insert the > > assert near the beginning, which might give us a better way of > > bisecting if this shows up again. >=20 > No, we begin in a very sorry state. Every one of the patches reduces the > number of bugs with hflags. If we put the assert anywhere but the end, it > *will* fail. Heh, ok, understood. > If you can get the assert to trigger again, we can work out where the next > problem is hiding. Ok. *fingers crossed* --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --aAVdPbqhL9qQEENY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAmBlOy8ACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5Llig//bFHUkwajDCB9WgOdIyy3PsjkpuaOxpoJzJFCgnZkLGr6fakqtFBZyPsM zY4Xw1JxiCXkm5MFGi3Jv+Z1UeR2+7czFzG0BF2CpWihkdCxTK39O2TGLrLYZZ3b Aho5KipersFVSq8f5wiSS88bgMZ94Hnc3mroUdH0sIDszHGDSBOf0cTJ/UOvZ15C Dnq3oHwGTDZJe/0QX+/zzOuAg7v4uObyk0lG0O0E51Ax588q3ZzU4T4fGWzqmWAm 3UQdtsbwZ4uCrLGAHspMjeouGV/QlPX8dpCiMUM6P5RBH6Xz4qVoCeTnfe3IcJPm 5SNrrRCpxn+U68ZIQerekKPrHbsJbe+maxtDubw4hDydgsqU99puWV83PozoTnJc r15PIHtbUJ2c20XKOc2G4W7p9xFq0MF79ESu3dYi8FqxOe5vmgYvUe3Xo8PKYrZv eoXTOh72OIE6Ty1AbeSW7xK3RsrisuiCCBeiP/CrXbQGTIZNTrycD7ofbqNuqDxG bEMre2xoj9DXEr+M002vcpdMIV1Jqm0kbk/y8cf6Z8LRj+1FDPWC2XiCJJ1k5vPH tFBJb+8RHJf7GR1rWPB+zPtQluiK5kvy9m/NfD7TqnqbHgo/aXx1WEFURHmJh5/S Bw1wX8zZiD/Kjzz9T/YN7N+97ktL5Y3Y/bkDqPYprRW8TOJbzJU= =+kes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aAVdPbqhL9qQEENY--