qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné via" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<sstabellini@kernel.org>, <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	<paul@xen.org>, <mst@redhat.com>, <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	<ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-mapcache: avoid a race on memory map while using MAP_FIXED
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:53:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH6WfgdFpFaMYtvC@Air-de-Roger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618889702-13104-1-git-send-email-igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:35:02AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> When we're replacing the existing mapping there is possibility of a race
> on memory map with other threads doing mmap operations - the address being
> unmapped/re-mapped could be occupied by another thread in between.
> 
> Linux mmap man page recommends keeping the existing mappings in place to
> reserve the place and instead utilize the fact that the next mmap operation
> with MAP_FIXED flag passed will implicitly destroy the existing mappings
> behind the chosen address. This behavior is guaranteed by POSIX / BSD and
> therefore is portable.
> 
> Note that it wouldn't make the replacement atomic for parallel accesses to
> the replaced region - those might still fail with SIGBUS due to
> xenforeignmemory_map not being atomic. So we're still not expecting those.
> 
> Tested-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>

Should we add a 'Fixes: 759235653de ...' or similar tag here?

> ---
>  hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
> index 5b120ed..e82b7dc 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,20 @@ static void xen_remap_bucket(MapCacheEntry *entry,
>          if (!(entry->flags & XEN_MAPCACHE_ENTRY_DUMMY)) {
>              ram_block_notify_remove(entry->vaddr_base, entry->size);
>          }
> -        if (munmap(entry->vaddr_base, entry->size) != 0) {
> +
> +        /*
> +         * If an entry is being replaced by another mapping and we're using
> +         * MAP_FIXED flag for it - there is possibility of a race for vaddr
> +         * address with another thread doing an mmap call itself
> +         * (see man 2 mmap). To avoid that we skip explicit unmapping here
> +         * and allow the kernel to destroy the previous mappings by replacing
> +         * them in mmap call later.
> +         *
> +         * Non-identical replacements are not allowed therefore.
> +         */
> +        assert(!vaddr || (entry->vaddr_base == vaddr && entry->size == size));
> +
> +        if (!vaddr && munmap(entry->vaddr_base, entry->size) != 0) {

Oh, so remappings of foreign addresses must always use the same
virtual address space, I somehow assumed that you could remap an
existing foreign map (or dummy mapping) into a different virtual
address if you so wanted.

Thanks, Roger.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20  3:35 [PATCH] xen-mapcache: avoid a race on memory map while using MAP_FIXED Igor Druzhinin via
2021-04-20  3:39 ` no-reply
2021-04-20  9:51   ` Igor Druzhinin via
2021-04-20 10:51     ` Anthony PERARD via
2021-04-20  7:03 ` Paul Durrant
2021-04-20  8:53 ` Roger Pau Monné via [this message]
2021-04-20  9:45   ` Igor Druzhinin via
2021-04-20 10:26     ` Roger Pau Monné via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YH6WfgdFpFaMYtvC@Air-de-Roger \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).