Re: [PATCH] vhost-user-fs: fix features handling

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> > Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
> > 
> > Just returning requested features assumes they all of then are implemented
> > by server and results in setting unsupported configuration if some of them
> > are absent.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
> > ---
> >  hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c
> > index ac4fc34b36..6cf983ba0e 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,14 @@
> >  #include "monitor/monitor.h"
> >  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> >  
> > +static const int user_feature_bits[] = {
> > +    VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1,
> > +    VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC,
> > +    VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX,
> > +    VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY,
> > +    VHOST_INVALID_FEATURE_BIT
> > +};
> 
> Please add:
> 
> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED
> VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM
> 
> QEMU's virtiofsd does not enable either of these for now, but it's worth
> allowing the vhost-user device backend to participate in negotiation so
> that this can change in the future (or alternative virtiofsd
> implementations can support these features).

OK, so:


Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>


and queued, I'll add those extra 2 lines.  We seem pretty inconsistent
about all the different vhost-user devices.

Dave

-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK