From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E046DC433ED for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F16B613EE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:39:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7F16B613EE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOgE-0002LV-AC for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:39:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOas-0005Ts-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:33:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:60682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcOan-0006d7-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:33:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619771624; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/yJ8wFAyrSdoCQrKo+Bu5pp5R9TQbyjO7vQpiyXupA8=; b=XGsLqRrBwyD4i4y2bnK3EVNEFbpRfNIA7G4n+l0/z/TGw9EzmEZ/YGJwDDOMhKTSbtw2nW 23PJzzqQRn82FtWk0Rz43u9Vj13A7aqpoq2B+1O177rDNhjSSgpv+LdPzF7Im/KluWhRwI fPsjakWpDaW3DvQcylWnqzsDhgjg1tA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-566-csQRZ8sXNMuN1WOwh04Xyw-1; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:33:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: csQRZ8sXNMuN1WOwh04Xyw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B08D8049C5; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-103.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.103]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD695D9C6; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:33:33 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: huangy81@chinatelecom.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tests/migration: introduce multifd into guestperf Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.22, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Juan Quintela , qemu-devel , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +0800, huangy81@chinatelecom.cn wrote: > From: Hyman > > Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration > currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can > analysis the migration performance with all kinds of > migration. > > To request that multifd is enabled, with 4 channels: > $ ./tests/migration/guestperf.py \ > --multifd --multifd-channels 4 --output output.json > > To run the entire standardized set of multifd-enabled > comparisons, with unix migration: > $ ./tests/migration/guestperf-batch.py \ > --dst-host localhost --transport unix \ > --filter compr-multifd* --output outputdir > > Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) > --- > tests/migration/guestperf/comparison.py | 14 ++++++++++++++ > tests/migration/guestperf/engine.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > tests/migration/guestperf/scenario.py | 12 ++++++++++-- > tests/migration/guestperf/shell.py | 10 +++++++++- > 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé I'll queue it, sorry for the delay in responding to this. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|