On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:00:35PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> @@ -3097,9 +3097,10 @@ static void lo_copy_file_range(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino_in, off_t off_in,
>  
>      fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG,
>               "lo_copy_file_range(ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, "
> -             "off=%lu, ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, "
> -             "off=%lu, size=%zd, flags=0x%x)\n",
> -             ino_in, in_fd, off_in, ino_out, out_fd, off_out, len, flags);
> +             "off=%ju, ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, "
> +             "off=%ju, size=%zd, flags=0x%x)\n",
> +             ino_in, in_fd, (intmax_t)off_in,
> +             ino_out, out_fd, (intmax_t)off_out, len, flags);

The rest of the patch used uint64_t. Why intmax_t here?

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>