qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] QIOChannelSocket: Implement io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocopy for CONFIG_LINUX
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:18:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWZ6JIstNuvuOWtt@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009075612.230283-3-leobras@redhat.com>

On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 04:56:12AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> @@ -154,6 +161,17 @@ int qio_channel_socket_connect_sync(QIOChannelSocket *ioc,
>          return -1;
>      }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
> +    ret = qemu_setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, &v, sizeof(v));
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        /* Zerocopy not available on host */
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    qio_channel_set_feature(QIO_CHANNEL(ioc),
> +                            QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_WRITE_ZEROCOPY);

This is okay I think, but looks a bit weird.  Maybe nicer to be written as:

#if LINUX
      ret = setsockopt();
      if (ret == 0) {
          qio_channel_set_feature(...);
      }
#endif
      return 0;

?

> +#endif
> +
>      return 0;
>  }

[...]

> +static ssize_t qio_channel_socket_writev_zerocopy(QIOChannel *ioc,
> +                                                  const struct iovec *iov,
> +                                                  size_t niov,
> +                                                  Error **errp)
> +{
> +    QIOChannelSocket *sioc = QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET(ioc);
> +    ssize_t ret;
> +
> +    ret = qio_channel_socket_writev_flags(ioc, iov, niov, NULL, 0,
> +                                          MSG_ZEROCOPY, errp);
> +    if (ret == QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_NOBUFS) {
> +        if (errp && *errp) {

Hmm this seems wrong, *errp should be NULL in most cases, meanwhile I think
error_setg*() takes care of errp==NULL too, so maybe we can drop this?

> +            error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> +                             "Process can't lock enough memory for using MSG_ZEROCOPY");
> +        }
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    sioc->zerocopy_queued++;
> +    return ret;
> +}

-- 
Peter Xu



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  7:56 [PATCH v4 0/3] MSG_ZEROCOPY for multifd Leonardo Bras
2021-10-09  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] QIOChannel: Add io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocopy callbacks Leonardo Bras
2021-10-11 19:17   ` Eric Blake
2021-10-11 19:38     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-11 20:45       ` Eric Blake
2021-10-11 20:59         ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-13  6:07   ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13  6:32     ` Peter Xu
2021-10-27  6:07       ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-27  6:15         ` Peter Xu
2021-10-27  6:31           ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-09  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] QIOChannelSocket: Implement io_writev_zerocopy & io_flush_zerocopy for CONFIG_LINUX Leonardo Bras
2021-10-11 19:27   ` Eric Blake
2021-10-11 19:44     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-13  6:18   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-10-27  6:30     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-11-02 13:13   ` Juan Quintela
2021-11-03 20:50     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-09  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] multifd: Implement zerocopy write in multifd migration (multifd-zerocopy) Leonardo Bras
2021-10-11 19:31   ` Eric Blake
2021-10-11 19:56     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-12  5:53       ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28  1:56         ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-28  4:30           ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28  4:37             ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-13  6:23   ` Peter Xu
2021-10-27  6:47     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-10-27  7:06       ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13  6:26   ` Peter Xu
2021-10-27  6:50     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-11-02 12:32   ` Juan Quintela
2021-11-03 21:29     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2021-11-03 23:24       ` Juan Quintela
2021-11-04  3:43         ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2022-04-14  4:00     ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWZ6JIstNuvuOWtt@t490s \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).