qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:17:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac0c7520-2f6b-fb49-c725-37b46272c835@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-xYWLzsfDAWWmEk4DhXcO5zqKVZMrRp9=4t9MBAasaMA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/12/19 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> +static uint32_t sve_zcr_get_valid_len(ARMCPU *cpu, uint32_t start_len)
>> +{
>> +    uint32_t start_vq = (start_len & 0xf) + 1;
>> +
>> +    return arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1) - 1;
> 
> "Subtract operation overflows on operands
> arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller(cpu, start_vq + 1U) and 1U"
> 
> Certainly it looks as if arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() can
> return 0, and claiming the valid length to be UINT_MAX
> seems a bit odd in that case.

The lsb is always set in the map, the minimum number we send to next_smaller is
2 -> so the minimum number returned from next_smaller is 1.

We should never return UINT_MAX.

>     return bitnum == vq - 1 ? 0 : bitnum + 1;

But yes, this computation doesn't seem right.

The beginning assert should probably be (vq >= 2 ...)
and here we should assert bitnum != vq - 1.


r~


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-13 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-01  8:51 [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 01/11] target/arm/monitor: Introduce qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 02/11] tests: arm: Introduce cpu feature tests Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 03/11] target/arm: Allow SVE to be disabled via a CPU property Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
2019-11-12 10:23   ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-13 20:17     ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2019-11-13 21:30       ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-15  8:29         ` Richard Henderson
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 05/11] target/arm/kvm64: Add kvm_arch_get/put_sve Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 06/11] target/arm/kvm64: max cpu: Enable SVE when available Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 07/11] target/arm/kvm: scratch vcpu: Preserve input kvm_vcpu_init features Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 08/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Support sve properties with KVM Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 09/11] target/arm/kvm: host cpu: Add support for sve<N> properties Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 16:46   ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-03 17:36     ` Andrew Jones
2022-02-03 17:40       ` Peter Maydell
2022-02-04 11:26         ` Andrew Jones
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 10/11] hw/arm/boot: Rebuild hflags when modifying CPUState at boot Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  8:51 ` [PULL 11/11] target/arm: Allow reading flags from FPSCR for M-profile Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  9:30 ` [PULL 00/11] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
2019-11-01  9:54   ` Andrew Jones
2019-11-01 10:34     ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 12:53       ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-01 14:25         ` Andrew Jones
2019-11-02 17:57           ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac0c7520-2f6b-fb49-c725-37b46272c835@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).