On 11/21/19 1:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:23 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Let's sync all the protvirt header changes
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h |  3 ++-
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> index 18892d6541..d031051601 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -995,6 +995,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE 170
>>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS 171
>>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_GENERIC 172
>> +#define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED 180
>> +#define KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS 181
> 
> Hm, where does this cap come from? I did not see it in the kernel
> patches.

It'll be part of the V1 once I send it out.
Pierre found the problem while reviewing QEMU, so I fixed it in both repos.

> 
>>  
>>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>  
>