qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH qemu] qapi: Add query-memory-checksum
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:33:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9098689-a8cb-0c68-0065-f9362cdcb32d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822011620.106337-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2200 bytes --]

On 8/21/19 8:16 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This returns MD5 checksum of all RAM blocks for migration debugging
> as this is way faster than saving the entire RAM to a file and checking
> that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> 
> 
> I am actually wondering if there is an easier way of getting these
> checksums and I just do not see it, it cannot be that we fixed all
> memory migration bugs :)

I'm not sure whether the command itself makes sense, but for the interface:


> +++ b/qapi/misc.json
> @@ -1194,6 +1194,33 @@
>  ##
>  { 'command': 'query-memory-size-summary', 'returns': 'MemoryInfo' }
>  
> +##
> +# @MemoryChecksum:
> +#
> +# A string with MD5 checksum of all RAMBlocks.
> +#
> +# @checksum: the checksum.
> +#
> +# Since: 3.2.0

This should be 4.2, not 3.2.

> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'MemoryChecksum',
> +  'data'  : { 'checksum': 'str' } }
> +
> +##
> +# @query-memory-checksum:
> +#
> +# Return the MD5 checksum of all RAMBlocks.
> +#
> +# Example:
> +#
> +# -> { "execute": "query-memory-checksum" }
> +# <- { "return": { "checksum": "a0880304994f64cb2edad77b9a1cd58f" } }
> +#
> +# Since: 3.2.0

and again

> +##
> +{ 'command': 'query-memory-checksum',
> +  'returns': 'MemoryChecksum' }
> +
>  

> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -2050,6 +2050,22 @@ void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
>      return rb->host;
>  }
>  
> +gchar *qemu_ram_chksum(void)

gchar is a pointless glib type.  Use 'char' instead.

> +{
> +    struct RAMBlock *rb;
> +    GChecksum *chksum = g_checksum_new(G_CHECKSUM_MD5);
> +    gchar *ret;
> +
> +    RAMBLOCK_FOREACH(rb) {
> +        g_checksum_update(chksum, qemu_ram_get_host_addr(rb),
> +                          qemu_ram_get_used_length(rb));
> +    }
> +    ret = g_strdup(g_checksum_get_string(chksum));
> +    g_checksum_free(chksum);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}

How long does this take to run?  Is it something where you really want
to block the guest while chewing over the guest's entire memory?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  1:16 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH qemu] qapi: Add query-memory-checksum Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-08-22  1:33 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2019-08-22  3:20   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-08-22 14:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-08-22 14:49   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-08-23  5:49     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-08-23  9:23       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-08-23 11:41         ` Markus Armbruster
2019-08-26  4:28           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9098689-a8cb-0c68-0065-f9362cdcb32d@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).