On 11/28/19 4:28 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote: >> IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so >> adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank >> --- >> target/s390x/ioinst.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c >> index c437a1d8c6..d3bd422ddd 100644 >> --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c >> +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c >> @@ -110,11 +110,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra) >> int cssid, ssid, schid, m; >> SubchDev *sch; >> SCHIB schib; >> - uint64_t addr; >> + uint64_t addr = 0; >> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; >> - uint8_t ar; >> + uint8_t ar = 0; >> >> - addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + if (!env->pv) { >> + addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + } >> if (addr & 3) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); >> return; >> @@ -167,11 +169,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra) >> int cssid, ssid, schid, m; >> SubchDev *sch; >> ORB orig_orb, orb; >> - uint64_t addr; >> + uint64_t addr = 0; >> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; >> - uint8_t ar; >> + uint8_t ar = 0; >> >> - addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + if (!env->pv) { >> + addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + } >> if (addr & 3) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); >> return; >> @@ -198,12 +202,14 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra) >> void ioinst_handle_stcrw(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra) >> { >> CRW crw; >> - uint64_t addr; >> + uint64_t addr = 0; >> int cc; >> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; >> - uint8_t ar; >> + uint8_t ar = 0; >> >> - addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + if (!env->pv) { >> + addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + } >> if (addr & 3) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); >> return; >> @@ -228,13 +234,15 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, >> { >> int cssid, ssid, schid, m; >> SubchDev *sch; >> - uint64_t addr; >> + uint64_t addr = 0; >> int cc; >> SCHIB schib; >> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; >> - uint8_t ar; >> + uint8_t ar = 0; >> >> - addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + if (!env->pv) { >> + addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + } >> if (addr & 3) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); >> return; >> @@ -294,16 +302,18 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra) >> int cssid, ssid, schid, m; >> SubchDev *sch; >> IRB irb; >> - uint64_t addr; >> + uint64_t addr = 0; >> int cc, irb_len; >> - uint8_t ar; >> + uint8_t ar = 0; >> >> if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, ra); >> return -EIO; >> } >> trace_ioinst_sch_id("tsch", cssid, ssid, schid); >> - addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + if (!env->pv) { >> + addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar); >> + } >> if (addr & 3) { >> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); >> return -EIO; > > Would it make sense to hide all these changes in decode_basedisp_s() > instead? ... so that decode_basedisp_s() returns 0 if env->pv == true ? > ... or are there still cases where we need real values from > decode_basedisp_s() in case of env->pv==true? I'd like to keep decode_basedisp_s() as is, but how about a static function in ioinst.c called something like get_address_from_regs()? It'll call decode_basedisp_s() or return 0. > > Anyway, > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth > Thanks!