qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Hyman <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: Disable manual dirty log when dirty ring enabled
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:17:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c49abf47-412c-26b8-0a28-c1007eed0159@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210310203301.194842-10-peterx@redhat.com>

Hi Peter,

On 2021/3/11 4:33, Peter Xu wrote:
> KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 is for KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG, which is only
> useful for KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG.  Skip enabling it for kvm dirty ring.
> 
> More importantly, KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET will not wr-protect all the pages
> initially, which is against how kvm dirty ring is used - there's no way for kvm
> dirty ring to re-protect a page before it's notified as being written first
> with a GFN entry in the ring!  So when KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is enabled
> with dirty ring, we'll see silent data loss after migration.
I feel a little regret that dirty ring can not work with KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET ...
With KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET, we can speedup dirty log start. More important, we can
enable dirty log gradually. For write fault based dirty log, it greatly reduces the side
effect of dirty log over guest.

I hope we can put forward another similar optimization under dirty ring mode. :)

Thanks,
Keqian

> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index 10137b6af11..ae9393266b2 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -2173,20 +2173,29 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    dirty_log_manual_caps =
> -        kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);
> -    dirty_log_manual_caps &= (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE |
> -                              KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET);
> -    s->manual_dirty_log_protect = dirty_log_manual_caps;
> -    if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
> -        ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2, 0,
> -                                   dirty_log_manual_caps);
> -        if (ret) {
> -            warn_report("Trying to enable capability %"PRIu64" of "
> -                        "KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 but failed. "
> -                        "Falling back to the legacy mode. ",
> -                        dirty_log_manual_caps);
> -            s->manual_dirty_log_protect = 0;
> +    /*
> +     * KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 is not needed when dirty ring is
> +     * enabled.  More importantly, KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET will assume no
> +     * page is wr-protected initially, which is against how kvm dirty ring is
> +     * usage - kvm dirty ring requires all pages are wr-protected at the very
> +     * beginning.  Enabling this feature for dirty ring causes data corruption.
> +     */
> +    if (!s->kvm_dirty_ring_enabled) {
> +        dirty_log_manual_caps =
> +            kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);
> +        dirty_log_manual_caps &= (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE |
> +                                  KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET);
> +        s->manual_dirty_log_protect = dirty_log_manual_caps;
> +        if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
> +            ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2, 0,
> +                                    dirty_log_manual_caps);
> +            if (ret) {
> +                warn_report("Trying to enable capability %"PRIu64" of "
> +                            "KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 but failed. "
> +                            "Falling back to the legacy mode. ",
> +                            dirty_log_manual_caps);
> +                s->manual_dirty_log_protect = 0;
> +            }
>          }
>      }
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-10 20:32 [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: Dirty ring support (QEMU part) Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] memory: Introduce log_sync_global() to memory listener Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] KVM: Use a big lock to replace per-kml slots_lock Peter Xu
2021-03-22 10:47   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-22 13:54     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-22 16:27       ` Peter Xu
2021-03-24 18:08         ` Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] KVM: Create the KVMSlot dirty bitmap on flag changes Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] KVM: Provide helper to get kvm dirty log Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] KVM: Provide helper to sync dirty bitmap from slot to ramblock Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] KVM: Simplify dirty log sync in kvm_set_phys_mem Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] KVM: Cache kvm slot dirty bitmap size Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] KVM: Add dirty-gfn-count property Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] KVM: Disable manual dirty log when dirty ring enabled Peter Xu
2021-03-22  9:17   ` Keqian Zhu [this message]
2021-03-22 13:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-22 16:21       ` Peter Xu
2021-03-10 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] KVM: Dirty ring support Peter Xu
2021-03-22 13:37   ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-22 18:52     ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  1:25       ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-19 18:12 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] KVM: Dirty ring support (QEMU part) Peter Xu
2021-03-22 14:02 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-22 19:45   ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  6:40     ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-23 14:34       ` Peter Xu
2021-03-24  2:56         ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-24 15:09           ` Peter Xu
2021-03-25  1:21             ` Keqian Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c49abf47-412c-26b8-0a28-c1007eed0159@huawei.com \
    --to=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=huangy81@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).