From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26889C433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C296601FF for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:49:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9C296601FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWZ0-0008PO-LR for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:49:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWVC-0003jx-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:45:42 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWVB-0007VZ-8w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:45:42 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE97ACBC; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 18:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC v1 00/38] arm cleanup experiment for kvm-only build To: Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell References: <20210221092449.7545-1-cfontana@suse.de> <875z2k53mn.fsf@linaro.org> <63847c79-93c2-5ee3-d568-9091fedf325c@suse.de> <87a6rmkffo.fsf@linaro.org> <8d4a427a-94dd-7472-e8ae-98c4efa44ce0@suse.de> <5fb3cf49-fc09-7e7c-d34e-299f04e9842a@suse.de> <335966c3-9f31-5868-54e5-edb28a37c50c@suse.de> From: Claudio Fontana Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:45:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.220.15; envelope-from=cfontana@suse.de; helo=mx2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , QEMU Developers , Roman Bolshakov , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 3/3/21 7:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 3/3/21 10:20 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> On 3/3/21 7:17 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>> On 3/3/21 7:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 17:57, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>>>> One thing I noticed is that tests try to run qemu-system-aarch64 with accel "qtest" and machine "virt", >>>>> and the thing tries to create a cortex-a15 cpu model for some unknown reason. >>>> >>>> That is expected. The default CPU type for 'virt' is cortex-a15; if you want >>>> something else then you need to specify the -cpu option. >>>> >>>> -- PMM >>>> >>> >>> I see, I'll experiment a bit thanks. >>> >>> I assume changing the default to "max" is out of the question, >>> and we should instead feed the -cpu option from the tests? >>> >> >> And since we are on topic, should the qemu-system-aarch64 still contain the cortex-a15 cpu model for some reason? > > The goal is for qemu-system-arm and qemu-system-aarch64 to be as compatible as > possible. That's why the default is the same for both. > > > r~ > Ah too bad, then I need to rework some code, and we need to keep lots of stuff that otherwise could have gone away. It is a bit weird that qemu-system-aarch64 runs with a cortex-a15 model tbh, as cortex-a15 is not capable of aarch64. Thanks, Claudio