From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A38C433E0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B1020829 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="USo1k0bA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7B1020829 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1BBr-0007Ay-84 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:13:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1BAR-0005V0-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:12:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:57794 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1BAP-0000MT-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:12:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596125543; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=6AmNJhCqaT3lFRHiPhTvavMMXgP1Kog8WuR7ZOTUQM0=; b=USo1k0bAfCHpIQ279k2ywWpZaLu5Vv01P+yqUirTZ1K04IolHYKKuoSbPm4dN2vrlqHzF3 7RGzfpGZwn7kCHniRsQU5k4Hvj2CjfQgBaNI37vbSNPfQWchTqnTKZIzhrI458yutmnoIf /1LvahOZAGv3m5Snb93aLXY+d/LTNVQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-402-YZ6XoerHN6-J3BsO4p7K9g-1; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:12:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YZ6XoerHN6-J3BsO4p7K9g-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id t3so7079277wrr.5 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6AmNJhCqaT3lFRHiPhTvavMMXgP1Kog8WuR7ZOTUQM0=; b=k2JlFREVdbHSMt7HfiTO3fuOFI8CtbK6e2g24nbWQh/zzt4vR4ADaTFLeZFZqk9Sf7 xs/e0ykWMwiyJ8X7wGAVPY/c9D3nL0LKnXUhK3tY4WvI4x/0zrQki4IFQVg4m02QJ2tt iXHCI7pWOs0z4nv+UU0up6T8paTpddUjTRzrSLQSL/zZ/1SneQDhG5idQ6ESrkLF8C63 Db9oVMokJYNqVs574TT89XywdsHFuR0D+zJB5QkmT+Zy9DD6YPGoymYvK6+f6ZgOT801 W0ru87HJ6uYyIO4cUGyQ9I34HV3s/3Z6rKgmjfbuLtlH0g4jLHDQaIw8bd8U6ktQ6yLS wakQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532i0KQWzhOWIZGeD3c6RslPkLEg0nTHuk6xcpQxBnh24PqO4S1q NVtJp44piew2upCOHC2zlAF1Ar1cn+7APrP4YAuNDM2EpA/Lm6iYmnK7PNn7V6qSK5CPXc83aIb BpQD14jsmOI+yLRg= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a42:: with SMTP id t2mr3212666wrw.13.1596125540991; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWDW1ASUMFOOphkYzZDh3i51K+wLdxO2YRaPqe178hn5STRrIRL8ng0oF8St3saGgJOddm3w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a42:: with SMTP id t2mr3212644wrw.13.1596125540740; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.39] (214.red-88-21-68.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.21.68.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm9712725wrw.93.2020.07.30.09.12.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm/acpi: fix an out of spec _UID for PCI root To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200730155755.188845-1-mst@redhat.com> <20200730155755.188845-2-mst@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Autocrypt: addr=philmd@redhat.com; keydata= mQINBDXML8YBEADXCtUkDBKQvNsQA7sDpw6YLE/1tKHwm24A1au9Hfy/OFmkpzo+MD+dYc+7 bvnqWAeGweq2SDq8zbzFZ1gJBd6+e5v1a/UrTxvwBk51yEkadrpRbi+r2bDpTJwXc/uEtYAB GvsTZMtiQVA4kRID1KCdgLa3zztPLCj5H1VZhqZsiGvXa/nMIlhvacRXdbgllPPJ72cLUkXf z1Zu4AkEKpccZaJspmLWGSzGu6UTZ7UfVeR2Hcc2KI9oZB1qthmZ1+PZyGZ/Dy+z+zklC0xl XIpQPmnfy9+/1hj1LzJ+pe3HzEodtlVA+rdttSvA6nmHKIt8Ul6b/h1DFTmUT1lN1WbAGxmg CH1O26cz5nTrzdjoqC/b8PpZiT0kO5MKKgiu5S4PRIxW2+RA4H9nq7nztNZ1Y39bDpzwE5Sp bDHzd5owmLxMLZAINtCtQuRbSOcMjZlg4zohA9TQP9krGIk+qTR+H4CV22sWldSkVtsoTaA2 qNeSJhfHQY0TyQvFbqRsSNIe2gTDzzEQ8itsmdHHE/yzhcCVvlUzXhAT6pIN0OT+cdsTTfif MIcDboys92auTuJ7U+4jWF1+WUaJ8gDL69ThAsu7mGDBbm80P3vvUZ4fQM14NkxOnuGRrJxO qjWNJ2ZUxgyHAh5TCxMLKWZoL5hpnvx3dF3Ti9HW2dsUUWICSQARAQABtDJQaGlsaXBwZSBN YXRoaWV1LURhdWTDqSAoUGhpbCkgPHBoaWxtZEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokCVQQTAQgAPwIbDwYL CQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQSJweePYB7obIZ0lcuio/1u3q3A3gUCXsfWwAUJ KtymWgAKCRCio/1u3q3A3ircD/9Vjh3aFNJ3uF3hddeoFg1H038wZr/xi8/rX27M1Vj2j9VH 0B8Olp4KUQw/hyO6kUxqkoojmzRpmzvlpZ0cUiZJo2bQIWnvScyHxFCv33kHe+YEIqoJlaQc JfKYlbCoubz+02E2A6bFD9+BvCY0LBbEj5POwyKGiDMjHKCGuzSuDRbCn0Mz4kCa7nFMF5Jv piC+JemRdiBd6102ThqgIsyGEBXuf1sy0QIVyXgaqr9O2b/0VoXpQId7yY7OJuYYxs7kQoXI 6WzSMpmuXGkmfxOgbc/L6YbzB0JOriX0iRClxu4dEUg8Bs2pNnr6huY2Ft+qb41RzCJvvMyu gS32LfN0bTZ6Qm2A8ayMtUQgnwZDSO23OKgQWZVglGliY3ezHZ6lVwC24Vjkmq/2yBSLakZE 6DZUjZzCW1nvtRK05ebyK6tofRsx8xB8pL/kcBb9nCuh70aLR+5cmE41X4O+MVJbwfP5s/RW 9BFSL3qgXuXso/3XuWTQjJJGgKhB6xXjMmb1J4q/h5IuVV4juv1Fem9sfmyrh+Wi5V1IzKI7 RPJ3KVb937eBgSENk53P0gUorwzUcO+ASEo3Z1cBKkJSPigDbeEjVfXQMzNt0oDRzpQqH2vp apo2jHnidWt8BsckuWZpxcZ9+/9obQ55DyVQHGiTN39hkETy3Emdnz1JVHTU0Q== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 18:12:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200730155755.188845-2-mst@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/29 23:51:30 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -40 X-Spam_score: -4.1 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , vit9696 , Shannon Zhao , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Laszlo Ersek , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 7/30/20 5:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On ARM/virt machine type QEMU currently reports an incorrect _UID in > ACPI. > > The particular node in question is the primary PciRoot (PCI0 in ACPI), > which gets assigned PCI0 in ACPI UID and 0 in the > DevicePath. This is due to the _UID assigned to it by build_dsdt in > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c Which does not correspond to the primary PCI > identifier given by pcibus_num in hw/pci/pci.c > > In UEFI v2.8, section "10.4.2 Rules with ACPI _HID and _UID" ends with > the paragraph, > > Root PCI bridges will use the plug and play ID of PNP0A03, This will > be stored in the ACPI Device Path _HID field, or in the Expanded > ACPI Device Path _CID field to match the ACPI name space. The _UID > in the ACPI Device Path structure must match the _UID in the ACPI > name space. > > (See especially the last sentence.) > > A similar bug has been reported on i386, on that architecture it has > been reported to confuse at least macOS which uses ACPI UIDs to build > the DevicePath for NVRAM boot options, while OVMF firmware gets them via > an internal channel through QEMU. When UEFI firmware and ACPI have > different values, this makes the underlying operating system unable to > report its boot option. > > Reported-by: vit9696 Ditto: Reported-by: Vitaly Cheptsov > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Peter can you either ack or merge this one pls? > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > index 91f0df7b13..0a482ff6f7 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *memmap, > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CID", aml_string("PNP0A03"))); > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_SEG", aml_int(0))); > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(0))); > - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("PCI0"))); > + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0))); > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR", aml_unicode("PCIe 0 Device"))); > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1))); > >