qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: fam@euphon.net, kwolf@redhat.com, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com,
	sw@weilnetz.de, pl@kamp.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] block/vpc: return ZERO block-status when appropriate
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 09:11:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8b28f4a-0bc6-2a08-14e2-ee68fb04efcb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507084800.20596-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

On 5/7/20 3:47 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> In case when get_image_offset() returns -1, we do zero out the
> corresponding chunk of qiov. So, this should be reported as ZERO.
> 
> Note that this changes visible output of "qemu-img map --output=json"
> and "qemu-io -c map" commands. For qemu-img map, the change is obvious:
> we just mark as zero what is really zero. For qemu-io it's less
> obvious: what was unallocated now is allocated.
> 
> There is an inconsistency in understanding of unallocated regions in
> Qemu: backing-supporting format-drivers return 0 block-status to report
> go-to-backing logic for this area. Some protocol-drivers (iscsi) return
> 0 to report fs-unallocated-non-zero status (i.e., don't occupy space on
> disk, read result is undefined).
> 
> BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED is defined as something more close to
> go-to-backing logic. Still it is calculated as ZERO | DATA, so 0 from
> iscsi is treated as unallocated. It doesn't influence backing-chain
> behavior, as iscsi can't have backing file. But it does influence
> "qemu-io -c map".
> 
> We should solve this inconsistency at some future point. Now, let's
> just make backing-not-supporting format drivers (vdi in the previous
> patch and vpc now) to behave more like backing-supporting drivers
> and not report 0 block-status. More over, returning ZERO status is
> absolutely valid thing, and again, corresponds to how the other
> format-drivers (backing-supporting) work.
> 
> After block-status update, it never reports 0, so setting
> unallocated_blocks_are_zero doesn't make sense (as the only user of it
> is bdrv_co_block_status and it checks unallocated_blocks_are_zero only
> for unallocated areas). Drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   block/vpc.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07  8:47 [PATCH v2 0/9] drop unallocated_blocks_are_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] qemu-img: convert: don't use unallocated_blocks_are_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] block: inline bdrv_unallocated_blocks_are_zero() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07 14:08   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-28  9:31     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] block/vdi: return ZERO block-status when appropriate Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07 14:10   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] block/vpc: " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07 14:11   ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] block/crypto: drop unallocated_blocks_are_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] block/iscsi: " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] block/file-posix: " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] block/vhdx: " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] block: " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-07 14:21   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-07 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/9] qed: Simplify backing reads Eric Blake
2020-05-07 15:22   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-07 18:22   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] drop unallocated_blocks_are_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8b28f4a-0bc6-2a08-14e2-ee68fb04efcb@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).