From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8C4C433DB for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F6264E99 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:47:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 08F6264E99 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=amsat.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37034 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdTN-0007OQ-3M for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:47:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdKl-0007uL-Ly; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:38:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]:35694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAdKV-000308-B3; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:38:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id n10so551534wmq.0; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:38:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FFIi3TXvMYzhbt4jBTGb8g8HO7wJ0jCnBq/XPrkq11Y=; b=JG2KnB4K3cGEUqbKsrKB3SP+uoTNeagqpJW2vOJVRBEgMoAu+0fCHAdNJTO86wGP5Y rfpgvhAw18v2NU9iE4hlATT7wuuTGtvVjHZJ9n02PUc71VSOgL+FaLMqMODmt//cm7D+ rb7678KUSe70sDDVvY0FwdnGKZbMMHIlwSSaG9b8PSQA5xZ0K5pE4aP/EPxK2OWxWJW6 my4le/1nmzCkzqM19XTYk0bKvtqwXC9s5qNGGteS5O0Ip7klB2EAk65sGt7f7rWP6tZr yMB3aOazDrTko/v/AqXHVnbHzjNciFVeyg4IEi5xvEbEFwNP0+Sb+ceevSpHNUdfjI5A +F8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FFIi3TXvMYzhbt4jBTGb8g8HO7wJ0jCnBq/XPrkq11Y=; b=dk8aY3qt/fj0jOT0sK9GMpj2g/MSH07ndOLLXyziRZAYJcdMTc9kAshXQv7hwdU8O2 ejLHEn5Nn7A6TEzOKjVTooGXFxL5Hv01UiD2e8qrzwKJMMusVSprHBPsPv3Bgip1EI34 fHPypPaDxuWw/pyNWt8FWNW5K5jd9XVJMACkhI2aJlKRnB4dPwmv5/9cIAI/QvxRm/21 mew/fwG5RB8KFhNvx8btQQC7THTmlPScCQTyaSTHimTFOoAwUD30cdd8c9U9hFOEqAsa p54Ii+TO2Ro0SLOb+VKNIGFJk8bb1sg5lqjO4WVeRgPoYPRuNRdhVVSRgZHso+Z1sxJr DrXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532X4+hcebjJf2EtNA9T7tXd+95tLOjP3ncBzsTPYtoyxXKDhVNK yrHmf6PJfAYJT6c8quPBHlJiRanmGKA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzT9cDjFafhPtUm/g7cE6GCsCnTTbMO5zu0+kiqgsSZWLjUPM+rZGlvnKECyRk0CvWsrYYSBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf19:: with SMTP id l25mr3802092wmg.85.1613155088340; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (68.red-83-57-175.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.57.175.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u14sm12117300wro.10.2021.02.12.10.38.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:38:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] hw/arm: New board model mps3-an524 To: Peter Maydell References: <20210205170019.25319-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <7d4db6f0-1e11-afb1-2b58-2e115a0a2dd0@amsat.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:38:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32e; envelope-from=philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.119, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , qemu-arm , "Daniel P . Berrange" , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2/5/21 8:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 19:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:21 PM Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 18:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>> On 2/5/21 5:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>> (The selftest is part of the AN524 >>>>> download so it's behind a EULA click-through and we can't put it >>>>> into an acceptance test. We might be able to get something >>>>> based on Zephyr or Arm TFM.) >>>> >>>> Wondering about that... If anyone can go/click/accepts the EULA and >>>> download artifacts, then I'd like these tests to be committed to the >>>> repository, with a comment containing the download link, and the test >>>> can use the skipUntil(BLOB_PATH && BLOB_HASH) syntax to assert the >>>> binary I downloaded is the same you used for your test. >>> >>> I would rather not get into that. The selftest doesn't actually >>> exercise as much of the emulation as you might think anyway. >> >> This was clear from the previous paragraph, I was asking about the possibility >> to have developers/maintainers individually accept EULA to download artifacts >> for integration testing. > > Yes, and that is the thing I would rather we didn't get into. > We should just have suitably redistributable acceptance tests > where we can. OK, understood.