From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A76EC433B4 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C499E60FF1 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:23:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C499E60FF1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vivier.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liaOu-0001LS-Qi for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 06:23:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liaNN-0006Mc-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 06:21:29 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:59043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liaNL-00033O-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 06:21:29 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.43] ([82.142.31.78]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N336L-1lLsPx0i57-013Q1J; Mon, 17 May 2021 12:21:24 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/25] linux-user/sparc: Merge sparc64 target_syscall.h To: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210426025334.1168495-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20210426025334.1168495-8-richard.henderson@linaro.org> From: Laurent Vivier Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 12:21:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210426025334.1168495-8-richard.henderson@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:w1XZFKD8roFIl6C0hoZ/dSiWs3Of6qIiVsjlX2ZGt9f0yKUhLHN ce8SdqCKzzF5ndzuEqCXRE3tAhlDXPMcnAeBEmLeNijd1x5oiM+PSrLlAD3j+nibvdOTe3a m2zI0KSp78+w2zOb9tBUs5K/v9Ncqe4or3lkggIS33983NYwcyC1KX3PB+ABBhMVGY9n8dY a2UmMWEuwo3s1AWUuIvkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:u+qHmqQAy0s=:OxyjHol+mNtrIWad/sZ83q 4aZaqxW+CiYHlTrDGPfXD3rKy4PWGJuJSlr35maJ/O1MYz9dtq9hLIPD396tYe0JOa16jxjJk TjorhhtChrJD1tYIwoAHhu8iTH7KLW10KSnS+mm3PvTM6i2eGmomUAWaLcucrJkrxtu+I8/wE c7W8MfQFesUn5APIG8rkNau3zfp2jKixKJl6/BcinYAKsOWcRLvBWwAUcPznS0jOF9xbV3QT3 kDf8GUEjmMMEWo4WYOoD9xXlWL81DDNdEofOdvDCc4mjz/KiPGea6QK01ogw9/My700PvVkX5 zxAb9/ZV/gKg06zadhAUAM3lIAVvpgC+6TFNByEOuDLGp/XzOeULFmFN2cR8WVDTU6e0vFL6t zAplZUuibvqSPm2GyhWEb1QAUAgItybpvmqXqurpqOZe4suW9MzktpT5fZCyP3QYP2Lyf3PvW HRwN4FDj+JxMQ8GqHPOKMtM2tkKJgBDBluKkiYRX0FBPk3gF2+xSRIycgMA7dv3y1iuCGM7OC n3MXN+lbj1pymX6lT7G3Vc= Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.227.126.130; envelope-from=laurent@vivier.eu; helo=mout.kundenserver.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 26/04/2021 04:53, Richard Henderson wrote: > There are only a few differences in sparc32 vs sparc64. > This fixes target_shmlba for sparc32plus, which is v9. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- > linux-user/sparc64/target_syscall.h | 36 +------------------------ > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h b/linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h > index d8ea04ea83..15d531f389 100644 > --- a/linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h > +++ b/linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h > @@ -3,18 +3,34 @@ ... > -#define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc" > +#ifdef TARGET_SPARC64 > +# define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc64" > +#else > +# define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc" > +#endif > #define UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE "2.6.32" Is it intended to have now an uname defined to "sparc64" with sparc32plus? (it was "sparc" before this change). Thanks, Laurent