From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Pierre Morel" <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>, "Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Pankaj Gupta" <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/15] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:19:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0d070b9-767f-66fb-8b97-0a758e34f183@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823122804.7692-11-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On 8/23/21 2:27 PM, Yanan Wang wrote:
> Currently the only difference between smp_parse and pc_smp_parse
> is the support of dies parameter and the related error reporting.
> With some arch compat variables like "bool dies_supported", we can
> make smp_parse generic enough for all arches and the PC specific
> one can be removed.
Ah, this is the opposite argument to my reply to your patch #5.
> Making smp_parse() generic enough can reduce code duplication and
> ease the code maintenance, and also allows extending the topology
> with more arch specific members (e.g., clusters) in the future.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/core/machine.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> hw/i386/pc.c | 84 +--------------------------------
> include/hw/boards.h | 9 ++++
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 12:27 [PATCH v7 00/15] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] machine: Deprecate "parameter=0" SMP configurations Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] machine: Minor refactor/fix for the smp parsers Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the omitted parameters Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] machine: Set the value of cpus to match maxcpus if it's omitted Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 13:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-24 4:51 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-08-24 7:29 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-08-24 8:23 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] hw: Add compat machines for 6.2 Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] machine: Prefer cores over sockets in smp parsing since 6.2 Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] machine: Use ms instead of global current_machine in sanity-check Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:27 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 13:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] machine: Remove smp_parse callback from MachineClass Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] machine: Move smp_prefer_sockets to struct SMPCompatProps Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] machine: Put all sanity-check in the generic SMP parser Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] machine: Split out the smp parsing code Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] tests/unit: Add a unit test for smp parsing Yanan Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0d070b9-767f-66fb-8b97-0a758e34f183@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).