From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABD6C433DF for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 16:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8232B20671 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 16:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EpHDgFRt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8232B20671 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnhH-000145-Np for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:05:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnf2-00060i-Ff for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:03:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:44713 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbney-0004o4-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:03:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590076982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xGmYH1jC98Zq6xEJaKzyV5qDw2qZzLWN2/8MC35T9l4=; b=EpHDgFRtZKQ27LQlPtAqCKWd+R3hHbm107vdGrXhrPWHqdrgGFjWP6IznOLQeGa08HOmMS KhDLG0HUkF9k0PdzeVbTHN6IcPZP+N6AETrqAg7b2cNBOC+HsqT56PSe/m/5NutMp5BYQC DHX/x7wOeFMvcO6BX+XSDiZT9WIy3Kg= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-24-U76cR2pZMlKiDewi7DSYKw-1; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:02:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: U76cR2pZMlKiDewi7DSYKw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id r7so3102917wrc.13 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:02:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xGmYH1jC98Zq6xEJaKzyV5qDw2qZzLWN2/8MC35T9l4=; b=aSROBRfL1Cgs1o4jS3R4AgOD01zDKar9vikLGaVcmH68Z6RfgZcGlPIiUgNJJuX1lw RnVg9vrpGajcf5MGJL30twn20g0m2+WbDiLE0BpCUtvx0b+WvMhGyHzPgzGrWWkOEAoI 7SXF7YD5gSyAap7xBspaW9/amNfFi67cxhw813GaGe25k+URMpxkV1wGmBrljAdtf60a HtE+Chs8xd0Y/MWwBKBNDcmsLLDA3XNsKYen9tDg5JS4vTIvspxDlxICS7O1+WhipLfl /TLo6O2AqTj2RmQlhnhqkIDGPCOA9mF5zkacHY++cTJc1a1FlbbxZkIfHIbEhC7LuAIJ FrBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xp5DGJuVTl/DcbR7/4obQq0GDAUd7IyJNNseYsO3KJ209bUU7 uuGIfqVRbNgyFbuFHtEItdfUAqFSxNYAqv3T+r9Rlod28nGwMiDu9jiWpRjudl/tQVqQvYdF6QB M3hwDg9O7b4qM/a8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2c4e:: with SMTP id r14mr10066868wmg.118.1590076930346; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwN1XT+ltL1eLoDcfylfjzJC+4mSl14Wv+YoPA2+5eB9Hsx0vy1/PEvU2PN9mh/nuPAlSHmyw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2c4e:: with SMTP id r14mr10066820wmg.118.1590076929743; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.58] ([151.21.160.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v131sm7465617wmb.27.2020.05.21.09.02.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 May 2020 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry To: Igor Mammedov , Roman Kagan References: <20200424123444.3481728-1-arilou@gmail.com> <20200424123444.3481728-6-arilou@gmail.com> <20200505150637.7131e79b@redhat.com> <20200511182121.GA1307176@rvkaganb.lan> <20200513173414.62e3cb4e@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 18:02:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200513173414.62e3cb4e@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/21 01:47:40 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com, Jon Doron , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, liran.alon@oracle.com, Roman Kagan , vkuznets@redhat.com, "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , ehabkost@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 13/05/20 17:34, Igor Mammedov wrote: > I'd rather avoid using random IRQ numbers (considering we are dealing with > black-box here). So if it's really necessary to have IRQ described here, > I'd suggest to implement them in device model so they would be reserved > and QEMU would error out in a sane way if IRQ conflict is detected. We don't generally detect ISA IRQ conflicts though, do we? Paolo