qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:42:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc769a96-a304-7429-5dee-a65b52179b1c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318120837.cg4gfdpchjwiabav@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>

On 3/18/21 1:08 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:32:30PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> And why do we have a separate arm_cpu_finalize_features()?
> 
> Separate, because it's not just called from arm_cpu_realizefn().

In particular it is also called by the monitor.c in qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion(),

which basically creates an object of the cpu subclass,
and then calls arm_cpu_finalize_[features]() explicitly on the object.

Is the qdev realize() method not called in this case? Should instead it be triggered, rather than initializing/realizing an incomplete object?

> 
>>
>> Nothing in the ARM cpu classes initializations ever seems to be "final" to me.
> 
> Some CPU features cannot be simply switched on/off at the property
> parse time. For example, there could be dependencies on multiple
> properties, the mutual exclusion of properties, or other aspects
> that can only be known later than property parse time. That stuff
> goes in arm_cpu_finalize_features().

Seems like _part_ of that is in arm_cpu_finalize_[features]() (in practice, this ends up being AARCH64-only stuff,
ie SVE, PAUTH and KVM).

After calling that, the arm realizefn() also does further setting and unsetting of features, checking previous feature states.

There is a whole lot following the arm_cpu_finalize_[features]() call,
there are ~300 lines of features initializations happening _after_ the call to arm_cpu_finalize_[features]().

> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-18 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 14:27 arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible? Claudio Fontana
2021-03-11 15:02 ` Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 15:21   ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-11 16:02     ` Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 16:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 17:16     ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-11 17:35       ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-03-11 18:33       ` Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 19:10         ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 11:06           ` arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?) Claudio Fontana
2021-03-18 11:32             ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-18 12:08               ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 12:42                 ` Claudio Fontana [this message]
2021-03-18 12:59                   ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 13:10                     ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-03-19  8:19                       ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-19  8:23             ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-19  8:33               ` Claudio Fontana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc769a96-a304-7429-5dee-a65b52179b1c@suse.de \
    --to=cfontana@suse.de \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).