From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535DDC2D0DB for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2524721D7D for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="u7ak+r4H" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2524721D7D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuiJS-000291-9f for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:38:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhSB-0008AT-9X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:43:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhS9-0008MY-ER for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:43:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]:40072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuhS7-0008LO-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:43:39 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id k25so1803021pgt.7 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:43:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:subject:cc:from:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GP/r9PIlSLqYQhKV2QQNMvljVe8xKLDedn52KnK8YEc=; b=u7ak+r4HNGSYzN10dl2xekH55MhnLCc8D0BDny6v+p+7ty6IqpkPDBs2Bz1lLqsLVD 0VPIArxeBGBEBi3xwCU4KdQ6yQHvavdsm3aH4cmDuvcc049LTROtvBnGDOM6P953XBcD 6FObmd69Vl+r0nldTIMco7AELRP9xEsJpatw3I1IbIKPEMGApcdwBMjtdwvvL1dmJTnS 4QzaC9OEM2KyY7KuX9pWUcHuIYt9PD/EshBtNNpSwXFHwHJwLa4syEXUyZB7NaC8K5Pt D4avERIouW9fvrimoS9WCLJwookIMGZNOJaMvEU7RbQpasAMSpB+Yk5zCL0CZSEVA0vZ 310w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:cc:from:to:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GP/r9PIlSLqYQhKV2QQNMvljVe8xKLDedn52KnK8YEc=; b=iS+cmRf8B4emLmaNuQXW5KfuPXNyEWzSod5EBSuzoaQSOrsT+rUqQiJMScP4PLXGZM wUXkHYd3tRxGE3ZcXWIPFsB7RW9fvKkAIXOAspQHGA5/xw2EfoF/217RX+8CVVE1gITJ CTMZ80ruAY6AOKy9zGzZnT6m8J6J/FrDe0t7loHG7JDzKiD2emVSI9b3CrAUoQ5BWTRs MOThKhJ8F+CLg6bGlfGiRkQNke3p4zGh1j8VsKyS1YywTwcmGY7/mrPWW2PJ76ojFoEq wujbUt0PKXE/6ho7jDSX/OOehAXgU0OE6HgkjjUgyUYsQd2IGQQy3m/42oCV5VaBt3H/ DmXA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV4RPw/05rSaE4CHHMk6z4fCGZYNHuCFPPllC2wuMj9D2vm1BDR VRO+lXkH+W4jTqLyR8NHAKwR2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8LKSOPhzj3wIR6MKwNKQ4u3nx3Bh0YeQptuOkDEI+tl1AjDXSb+kVGM5R4uC9JO+kGtX9mA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:66c6:: with SMTP id a189mr115356pgc.401.1579805017815; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:2514:bf69:4011:cfff:c9e3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d27sm3491014pgm.53.2020.01.23.10.43.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:43:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:43:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:43:35 PST (-0800) Subject: Re: [PULL] RISC-V Patches for the 5.0 Soft Freeze, Part 1 CC: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org From: Palmer Dabbelt To: Peter Maydell In-Reply-To: References: <20200121225703.148465-1-palmerdabbelt@google.com> Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::543 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 06:38:07 PST (-0800), Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 23:41, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> >> The following changes since commit 28b58f19d269633b3d14b6aebf1e92b3cd3ab56e: >> >> ui/gtk: Get display refresh rate with GDK version 3.22 or later (2020-01-16 14:03:45 +0000) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> git@github.com:palmer-dabbelt/qemu.git tags/riscv-for-master-5.0-sf1 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 82f014671cf057de51c4a577c9e2ad637dcec6f9: >> >> target/riscv: update mstatus.SD when FS is set dirty (2020-01-16 10:03:15 -0800) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> RISC-V Patches for the 5.0 Soft Freeze, Part 1 >> >> This patch set contains a handful of collected fixes that I'd like to target >> for the 5.0 soft freeze (I know that's a long way away, I just don't know what >> else to call these): >> >> * A fix for a memory leak initializing the sifive_u board. >> * Fixes to privilege mode emulation related to interrupts and fstatus. >> >> Notably absent is the H extension implementation. That's pretty much reviewed, >> but not quite ready to go yet and I didn't want to hold back these important >> fixes. This boots 32-bit and 64-bit Linux (buildroot this time, just for fun) >> and passes "make check". > > Hi. This pull request doesn't seem to be signed with the GPG > key that I have on record for you... When I moved to Google I got a Yubikey and made new subkeys for it. If I understand correctly the new subkeys should be signed by my main key, but maybe that didn't make it to your keyring? I see $ gpg --list-keys palmer@dabbelt.com pub rsa4096 2017-06-06 [SC] [expires: 2027-11-13] 00CE76D1834960DFCE886DF8EF4CA1502CCBAB41 uid [ultimate] Palmer Dabbelt uid [ultimate] Palmer Dabbelt sub rsa4096 2017-06-06 [E] sub rsa4096 2019-11-26 [S] [expires: 2024-11-24] sub rsa4096 2019-11-26 [A] [expires: 2024-11-24] sub rsa4096 2019-11-26 [E] [expires: 2024-11-24] I have the master key at home, so if I didn't do this right I can re-spin things tonight. > > thanks > -- PMM