From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> To: 'Chirantan Ekbote' <chirantan@chromium.org>, 'Sonny Rao' <sonnyrao@chromium.org> Cc: 'Doug Anderson' <dianders@chromium.org>, 'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>, 'David Riley' <davidriley@google.com>, 'Russell King' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, 'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm: dts: exynos5: Remove multi core timer Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:47:20 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <033a01cf74f2$d025ce80$70716b80$@samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAJFHJrrb2XFDZqJh4OuLdFP=J0aR4pGe-WLWKZ7ZpMfUSPGd4Q@mail.gmail.com> Chirantan Ekbote wrote: > > >>> Anyway, I'm by no means opposed to switching to arch timers. They > >>> provide a well designed, generic interface and drivers shared by > >>> multiple platforms, which means more code sharing and possibly more eyes > >>> looking at the code, which is always good. However if they don't support > >>> low power states correctly, we can't just remove MCT. > >> > >> I think low power states aren't in mainline (right?). > >> > >> One solution that might work could be to leave the device tree entry > >> alone but change the MCT init code to simply act as a no-op if it sees > >> an arch timer is in the device tree and enabled. Then when/if someone > >> got the low power states enabled we could just change source code > >> rather than dts files. > >> > Doug and I were talking about this and we think we may have a way to > have the mct and arch timers co-exist. The main issue is that the mct > (and therefore arch timer) gets cleared once during boot and every > time we do a suspend / resume. This happens in > exynos4_mct_frc_start() but it's not immediately clear to us why the > counter needs to be reset at all. If we remove the lines that clear > the counter then there is no longer an issue with having both the mct > and the arch timers on at the same time. > Yeah, actually we don't need to reset the count value after suspend/resume. So, how about following? I think, it should be fine to you. diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c index 8d64200..d24db6f 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c @@ -157,12 +157,15 @@ static void exynos4_mct_frc_start(u32 hi, u32 lo) { u32 reg; - exynos4_mct_write(lo, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L); - exynos4_mct_write(hi, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_U); - reg = __raw_readl(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); - reg |= MCT_G_TCON_START; - exynos4_mct_write(reg, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); + + if (!(reg & MCT_G_TCON_START)) { + exynos4_mct_write(lo, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L); + exynos4_mct_write(hi, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_U); + + reg |= MCT_G_TCON_START; + exynos4_mct_write(reg, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); + } } > Alternately, if there is some code that depends on the mct being reset > we could store an offset instead of clearing the counter and then > subtract that offset every time something reads it. Doug has a patch > that does this at > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/200298/. Effectively the > visible behavior will not change. Would either of these options work? > Hmm...I cannot open the webpage :( - Kukjin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] arm: dts: exynos5: Remove multi core timer Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:47:20 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <033a01cf74f2$d025ce80$70716b80$@samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAJFHJrrb2XFDZqJh4OuLdFP=J0aR4pGe-WLWKZ7ZpMfUSPGd4Q@mail.gmail.com> Chirantan Ekbote wrote: > > >>> Anyway, I'm by no means opposed to switching to arch timers. They > >>> provide a well designed, generic interface and drivers shared by > >>> multiple platforms, which means more code sharing and possibly more eyes > >>> looking at the code, which is always good. However if they don't support > >>> low power states correctly, we can't just remove MCT. > >> > >> I think low power states aren't in mainline (right?). > >> > >> One solution that might work could be to leave the device tree entry > >> alone but change the MCT init code to simply act as a no-op if it sees > >> an arch timer is in the device tree and enabled. Then when/if someone > >> got the low power states enabled we could just change source code > >> rather than dts files. > >> > Doug and I were talking about this and we think we may have a way to > have the mct and arch timers co-exist. The main issue is that the mct > (and therefore arch timer) gets cleared once during boot and every > time we do a suspend / resume. This happens in > exynos4_mct_frc_start() but it's not immediately clear to us why the > counter needs to be reset at all. If we remove the lines that clear > the counter then there is no longer an issue with having both the mct > and the arch timers on at the same time. > Yeah, actually we don't need to reset the count value after suspend/resume. So, how about following? I think, it should be fine to you. diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c index 8d64200..d24db6f 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c @@ -157,12 +157,15 @@ static void exynos4_mct_frc_start(u32 hi, u32 lo) { u32 reg; - exynos4_mct_write(lo, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L); - exynos4_mct_write(hi, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_U); - reg = __raw_readl(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); - reg |= MCT_G_TCON_START; - exynos4_mct_write(reg, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); + + if (!(reg & MCT_G_TCON_START)) { + exynos4_mct_write(lo, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L); + exynos4_mct_write(hi, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_U); + + reg |= MCT_G_TCON_START; + exynos4_mct_write(reg, EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON); + } } > Alternately, if there is some code that depends on the mct being reset > we could store an offset instead of clearing the counter and then > subtract that offset every time something reads it. Doug has a patch > that does this at > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/200298/. Effectively the > visible behavior will not change. Would either of these options work? > Hmm...I cannot open the webpage :( - Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 12:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-05-15 21:07 [PATCH] arm: dts: exynos5: Remove multi core timer Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-15 21:07 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-15 21:14 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 21:14 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 21:33 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 21:33 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 21:40 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 21:40 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 21:54 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 21:54 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 22:13 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 22:13 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 22:44 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 22:44 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 23:03 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-15 23:03 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-15 23:18 ` David Riley 2014-05-15 23:18 ` David Riley 2014-05-15 23:25 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 23:25 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 23:39 ` Olof Johansson 2014-05-15 23:39 ` Olof Johansson 2014-05-15 23:45 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 23:45 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 23:46 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 23:46 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 23:43 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 23:43 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-16 0:31 ` Sonny Rao 2014-05-16 0:31 ` Sonny Rao 2014-05-16 22:56 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-16 22:56 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-17 0:02 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-17 0:02 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-19 15:12 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-19 15:12 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-21 13:24 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-21 13:24 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-21 15:30 ` Olof Johansson 2014-05-21 15:30 ` Olof Johansson 2014-05-21 16:20 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-21 16:20 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-21 18:34 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-21 18:34 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-28 17:38 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-28 17:38 ` Doug Anderson 2014-06-02 23:22 ` Doug Anderson 2014-06-02 23:22 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-21 12:47 ` Kukjin Kim [this message] 2014-05-21 12:47 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-21 18:34 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-21 18:34 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-05-28 17:23 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-28 17:23 ` Doug Anderson 2014-06-03 18:41 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-06-03 18:41 ` Chirantan Ekbote 2014-06-04 1:45 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-06-04 1:45 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-28 17:37 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-28 17:37 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-29 20:42 ` Vincent Guittot 2014-05-29 20:42 ` Vincent Guittot 2014-05-29 21:41 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-29 21:41 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 21:44 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-15 21:44 ` Kukjin Kim 2014-05-15 21:44 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-15 21:44 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='033a01cf74f2$d025ce80$70716b80$@samsung.com' \ --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \ --cc=chirantan@chromium.org \ --cc=davidriley@google.com \ --cc=dianders@chromium.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=olof@lixom.net \ --cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \ --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.